you're reading...
Economic and Social Policies, PUBLICATIONS

Ranking of unsecured debt instruments in insolvency hierarchy [EU Legislation in Progress]

Written by Angelos Delivorias (1st edition),

Close Businessman Arranging Small Wooden Plain Blocks to a Pyramid Figure on Black Background. An Imaginative Business Hierarchy Concept.

© Gajus / Fotolia

Following the global financial crisis, the European Union extensively reformed its regulatory framework for financial services. With legislation such as the Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive (BRRD), it ensures that, through mechanisms such as ‘bail-in’, the recovery or restructuring of distressed financial institutions is done without spreading to other institutions, or using taxpayers’ money to bail them out. To ensure that sufficient financial resources are available for bail-in, the BRRD requires resolution authorities to set financial institutions a minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities (MREL). In parallel, a similar standard, the total loss-absorbing capacity (TLAC), was adopted internationally for systemically important financial institutions. The discretionary requirements in MREL and the compulsory requirement in TLAC concerning subordination of eligible liabilities have driven some Member States to amend the ranking of certain bank creditors under their national law. Given that national rules adopted so far diverge, unsecured debt holders and other creditors of banks can be treated differently from one Member State to another. The Commission aims to remedy this by establishing harmonised rules.


Proposal for a directive on amending Directive 2014/59/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the ranking of unsecured debt instruments in insolvency hierarchy
Committee responsible: Economic and Monetary Affairs (ECON)

COM(2016) 853

procedure ref.: 2016/0363(COD)

Ordinary legislative procedure (COD) (Parliament and Council on equal footing – formerly ‘co-decision’)

Rapporteur: Gunnar Hökmark (EPP, Sweden)
Shadow rapporteurs:








Pedro Silva Pereira (S&D, Portugal)

Syed Kamall (ECR, UK)

Sylvie Goulard (ALDE, France)

Fabio De Masi (GUE/NGL, Germany)

Ernest Urtasun (Greens/EFA, Spain)

Marco Valli (EFDD, Italy)

Marco Zanni (ENF, Italy

Next steps expected: Publication of draft report

Stage: draft report

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Download the EPRS App

EPRS App on Google Play
EPRS App on App Store
What Europe Does For You
EU Legislation in Progress
Topical Digests
EPRS Podcasts

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 3,081 other followers

RSS Link to Members’ Research Service

Disclaimer and Copyright statement

The content of all documents (and articles) contained in this blog is the sole responsibility of the author and any opinions expressed therein do not necessarily represent the official position of the European Parliament. It is addressed to the Members and staff of the EP for their parliamentary work. Reproduction and translation for non-commercial purposes are authorised, provided the source is acknowledged and the European Parliament is given prior notice and sent a copy.

For a comprehensive description of our cookie and data protection policies, please visit Terms and Conditions page.

Copyright © European Union, 2014-2019. All rights reserved.

%d bloggers like this: