you're reading...
BLOG, EP Answers

The Schengen Area and the EU’s visa policy

Travelling in Europe’s border-free Schengen area without a visa is one of the most concrete results for citizens, especially for young and mobile citizens. It is important for connecting people but it also requires trust that Member States properly secure their external borders and implement required measures.

3 language versions available in PDF format

EN: The Schengen Area and the EU’s visa policy

FR: L’espace Schengen et la politique de l’Union européenne en matière de visas

DE: Der Schengen-Raum und die Visumpolitik der EU

The Schengen Area and the EU's visa policy

© ma8 / Fotolia

The border-free Schengen Area guarantees free movement to more than 400 million EU citizens, as well as to many non-EU nationals, businessmen, tourists or other persons legally present on the EU territory.

Most EU Member States and four non-EU countries – Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway, and Switzerland – participate in the Schengen area. Only Ireland and the United Kingdom maintain opt-outs and have not signed the Schengen agreement. Four other EU states – Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus and Romania – are Schengen candidate countries and wish to join the Schengen area.

With the launch of Schengen cooperation, Member States have agreed to abolish internal border controls within the Schengen area. This requires trust that Member States properly secure their external borders and implement required measures.

The Schengen Borders Code (Schengen acquis) provides EU States with a single set of common rules that govern external border checks on persons, entry requirements and duration of stays in the Schengen Area.

Temporary reintroduction of internal border control

In an area without internal border control, it is necessary to have a common response to situations seriously affecting public policy or internal security. Therefore, the EU has adopted Regulation (EU) No 1051/2013 providing for the temporary reintroduction of internal border control in exceptional circumstances.

The reintroduction of internal border control might be exceptionally necessary in cases of serious threats to public policy or to internal security, in particular following terrorist incidents or threats, or because of threats posed by organised crime.

Schengen evaluation and monitoring mechanism

After a long period of inter-institutional negotiations, the Council adopted in 2013 a new Schengen evaluation and monitoring mechanism (Council Regulation (EU) No 1053/2013). Evaluations may cover all aspects of the Schengen acquis, including the effective and efficient application by the Member States of accompanying measures in the areas of external borders, visa policy, the Schengen Information System, data protection, police cooperation, judicial cooperation in criminal matters, as well as the absence of border control at internal borders.

The European Commission submits bi-annual reports on the functioning of the Schengen area. The sixth report covers the period 1 May – 31 October 2014.

Visa agreements

The efficient functioning of the border-free Schengen Area is realized through a common visa policy which facilitates the entry of legal visitors into the EU, while strengthening internal security.

The EU has a common list of countries whose citizens must have a visa when crossing the external borders and a list of countries whose citizens are exempt from that requirement. These lists are set out in Regulation No 539/2001 and its successive amendments.

In fact, the EU decides on visa exemptions based on a case-by-case assessment of a variety of criteria relating, inter alia, to illegal immigration, public policy and security, the economic benefits, in particular in terms of tourism and foreign trade, and the Union’s external relations with the relevant third countries including, in particular, human rights and fundamental freedoms considerations, as well as the implications of regional coherence and reciprocity.

The European Union may conclude visa facilitation agreements with non-EU countries, in order that both the EU and non-EU citizens benefit from facilitated procedures for issuing visas.

The European Parliament, for its part, adopted a resolution on 27 February 2014 on the future of EU visa policy, in which it “calls for the conclusion of further visa facilitation agreements, where appropriate, and for the monitoring and improvement of those already in existence”.

The European Commission “Schengen, Borders & Visas” webpage provides specific information about visa-facilitation agreements and visa-dialogues between the EU and individual non-EU countries.

Visa suspension and reciprocity mechanism

In order to ensure that visa-free travel with non-EU countries is not abused, the EU adopted in 2013 a new EU regulation (1289/2013) introducing a “visa suspension mechanism”. This mechanism allows, under strict conditions, for the temporary reintroduction of visa requirements for citizens of non-EU countries when there is an emergency situation caused by abuse of the visa-free regime.

The same regulation provide for a reciprocity mechanism for cases where a third country on the “positive list” (its nationals being exempt from the EU visa requirement) maintains or introduces a visa requirement for the citizens of one or more Member States.

The revised reciprocity mechanism aims for more solidarity among the Member States in the implementation of the common visa policy and provides for a quicker and more efficient reaction in case a third country on the positive list introduces or maintains a visa requirement for one or more Member States.

The European Commission published in October 2014 a report assessing the situation of non-reciprocity with certain third countries in the area of visa policy. According to this report, the Commission received notifications of non-reciprocity situations from five Member States: Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Poland and Romania. These notifications related to five third countries: Australia, Brunei Darussalam, Canada, Japan and the US.

Any questions on this issue or another EP-related concern? Please use our web form. You write, we answer.

About Ask EP

The Citizens' Enquiries Unit provides information on the activities, powers and organisation of the European Parliament. You ask, we answer.

Discussion

9 thoughts on “The Schengen Area and the EU’s visa policy

  1. Cyprus ki EU country

    Like

    Posted by Sajal | November 7, 2015, 17:21
  2. Next step: European passport!

    Like

    Posted by Silvia Moden | June 15, 2015, 22:35
  3. Denmark, Germany, Poland, Holland, Belgium, United Kindom, Luxembourg, France, Andorra, Portugal, Spain, Italy, Check Republic, Hungary, Romania, Greece, Bulgaria, Serbia, Croatia, Slovakia, Austria, Switzerland, Lichtenstein, Monaco……

    Like

    Posted by Markus | June 14, 2015, 00:46
  4. Norway, Sweden, Finland, Denmark, Iceland, Germany, Poland, Lithuania, Holland, Belgium, United Kindom, Ireland, Luxembourg, France, Andorra, Portugal, Spain, Italy, Check Republic, Hungary, Moldova, Romania, Greece, Bulgaria, Serbia, Croatia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Austria, Switzerland, Lichtenstein, Monaco…….

    Like

    Posted by Harald Olsen | June 13, 2015, 18:49
  5. I just have some very little time for reading.

    Like

    Posted by Pitchapa Chomduang | June 13, 2015, 14:16
  6. I have been in many european countries. In England for the UEFA Champions League final 2013, in Portugal, Spain, France, Netherlands, Belgium, Italy, Austria and Poland. The Schengen Area is the best thing and i can not imagine an europe without it.

    Like

    Posted by Christoph | June 13, 2015, 12:24
  7. Never forget the conquires,they must also be defend by us with a sense of responsabilty, and every day encourages against who doesn’t understand the results

    Like

    Posted by Lara Quaglia | June 13, 2015, 11:54
  8. “The border-free Schengen Area guarantees free movement to more than 400 million EU citizens, as well as to many non-EU nationals, businessmen, tourists or other persons legally present on the EU territory.”

    And business women too, presumably?

    Like

    Posted by F Byrne | January 16, 2015, 09:25

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Download the EPRS App

EPRS App on Google Play
EPRS App on App Store
What Europe Does For You
EU Legislation in Progress
Topical Digests
EPRS Podcasts

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 3,073 other followers

Disclaimer and Copyright statement

The content of all documents (and articles) contained in this blog is the sole responsibility of the author and any opinions expressed therein do not necessarily represent the official position of the European Parliament. It is addressed to the Members and staff of the EP for their parliamentary work. Reproduction and translation for non-commercial purposes are authorised, provided the source is acknowledged and the European Parliament is given prior notice and sent a copy.

For a comprehensive description of our cookie and data protection policies, please visit Terms and Conditions page.

Copyright © European Union, 2014-2019. All rights reserved.

%d bloggers like this: