Contrary to what the Parliament had requested, the initial list of commodities does not include maize and rubber. According to the Commission IA, an efficiency analysis, comparing the hectares of deforestation linked to EU consumption with the average value of EU imports for eight commodities, preselected based on literature review, showed that maize and rubber account for the smallest fraction of EU- embodied deforestation (see Figure 1), while their trade volumes are very large. The Commission thus concluded that bringing these two commodities within the scope of the proposal would have resulted in significant burdens, with limited returns in terms of curbing EU-driven deforestation.
Individual share of EU-embodied deforestation
Individual share of EU-embodied deforestation due to selected commodities between 2008 and 2017
In focus
We write about
Blogroll
Disclaimer and Copyright statement
The content of all documents (and articles) contained in this blog is the sole responsibility of the author and any opinions expressed therein do not necessarily represent the official position of the European Parliament. It is addressed to the Members and staff of the EP for their parliamentary work. Reproduction and translation for non-commercial purposes are authorised, provided the source is acknowledged and the European Parliament is given prior notice and sent a copy.
For a comprehensive description of our cookie and data protection policies, please visit Terms and Conditions page.
Copyright © European Union, 2014-2024. All rights reserved.
Be the first to write a comment.