you're reading...
International Relations, PUBLICATIONS

Talks resume – advancing towards a settlement on Transnistria?


Image Copyright AGphotographer
Used under Shutterstock Licence

The latest round of 5+2 negotiations for the settlement of the Transnistrian conflict took place in Vienna, on 12 and 13 July 2012. Abandoned in 2006, official 5+2 talks resumed in November 2011, involving Moldova, Transnistria, Russia, Ukraine and the Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE), as well as the European Union (EU) and the United States (US) as observers.


In 1990, the area on the east bank of the River Nistru (Transnistria) seceded from Moldova. Armed conflict ensued, with the former Soviet 14th Army intervening. The 1992 peace agreement recognised a special status for Transnistria within Moldova, to be defined later. Russian forces remain on the ground, rebranded as peacekeeping forces.

So far, the parties have failed to agree on a final legal status for Transnistria. However, the context for a settlement now seems more favourable, as both Moldova and Transnistria have changed leadership, official 5+2 negotiations have resumed and external actors are committed to facilitating a solution. Also, a pragmatic, gradual approach of solving concrete problems confronting the two societies has replaced the focus on the status. Joint working groups discuss a range of practical issues (economic and social, transport and telecommunications, health, education etc.), building trust between the parties.

Recent 5+2 talks

In April 2012, the previous round of 5+2 talks led to agreement on the principles and the agenda for negotiations. Equality between the parties in the negotiations and “nothing is agreed until everything is agreed” are examples of these principles. The agenda sets out socio-economic and other confidence-building measures; legal and humanitarian issues; and ultimately, institutional, political and security aspects related to a comprehensive settlement. The July 5+2 talks consolidated these achievements.

Additionally, in its recent resolution on Moldova, the OSCE Parliamentary Assembly called for constructive dialogue with the ultimate aim of agreeing on “a special legal status for the Transnistrian region in the composition of the Republic of Moldova”. It also appealed to Russia to withdraw its forces from Moldova and proposed replacing the current peacekeeping mechanism with an OSCE-led multinational civilian mission.

EU involvement

The EU participates as an observer in the 5+2 talks and supports confidence-building measures between the parties. Negotiations on an EU-Moldova Association Agreement started in 2010, including on a Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Area (DCFTA) in 2012. Moldova hopes that its progress toward EU integration would make it more attractive to Transnistrians, whose representatives are also invited to the DCFTA negotiations. Since 2005, the EU has deployed a border assistance mission to Moldova and Ukraine (EUBAM), advising the authorities of the two states on best practices for enhancing their border-management capacities.

Main Sources

Moldova Country Briefing / Julien Crampes, Elina Stergatou, Ekaterina Chirkova, Policy Department, DG External Policies, DG EXPO/B/PolDep/Note/2012_142, May 2012

Country Profile (Transnistria), in Europa World online, London, Routledge,  retrieved 20 July 2012

Transdniestr, in Jane’s Sentinel Security Assessment – Russia and the CIS, IHS Jane’s, April 2012

Further reading

Transnistrien und die künftige Sicherheitsarchitektur in Europa / Manfred Grund, Hans Martin Sieg, Kristin Wesemann, KAS Auslandsinformationen, Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung e.V., Sankt Augustin, September 2011

Leave a Reply

Download the EPRS App

EPRS App on Google Play
EPRS App on App Store
What Europe Does For You
EU Legislation in Progress
Topical Digests
EPRS Podcasts

Follow Blog via Email

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 3,550 other subscribers

Disclaimer and Copyright statement

The content of all documents (and articles) contained in this blog is the sole responsibility of the author and any opinions expressed therein do not necessarily represent the official position of the European Parliament. It is addressed to the Members and staff of the EP for their parliamentary work. Reproduction and translation for non-commercial purposes are authorised, provided the source is acknowledged and the European Parliament is given prior notice and sent a copy.

For a comprehensive description of our cookie and data protection policies, please visit Terms and Conditions page.

Copyright © European Union, 2014-2019. All rights reserved.

%d bloggers like this: