you're reading...
International Relations, PUBLICATIONS

Montenegro: which challenges for EU accession?

Montenegro applied for EU membership in 2008, two years after its independence. While the second Commission progress report of 10 October 2012 acknowledged the country’s efforts to tackle its main challenges, it stressed that problems remain.

State of play

In line with a new EU approach to accession negotiations, from the beginning of talks in June 2012, attention was given to Montenegro’s main challenges: negotiation chapters 23 (Judiciary and fundamental rights) and 24 (Justice, freedom and security).

Corruption, rule of law, organised crime, freedom of expression

© vepar5 / Fotolia

© vepar5 / Fotolia

The Commission acknowledges “some progress” in the fight against corruption: a law on the prevention of conflicts of interest forced MPs to resign from publicly-owned company boards and civil servants to declare assets. Whistleblowers receive better protection in the public and private sector. However, very few cases of high-level corruption (involving large projects, ministers, MPs, the judiciary, heads of public companies, the Real Estate Agency, etc.) have resulted in asset seizure.  Analysts blame a lack of political will, capacity and judicial independence. Corruption, the Commission concludes, “remains widespread”. As for the rule of law, Montenegro has improved selection procedures for judges and is planning to depoliticise appointments of prosecutors and members of the Judicial and Prosecutorial Council. Publishing court verdicts has rendered the judiciary more accountable, but it needs to demonstrate independence and efficiency and improve monitoring of conflicts of interest and corruption in its own ranks. Organised crime groups have infiltrated the public and private sectors, but the authorities have temporarily seized over €40 million in assets. The US State Department says that Montenegro is a source, transit and destination country for victims of sex trafficking and forced labour. The Commission attests “progress” in Montenegro’s fight against organised crime. In the area of fundamental rights and freedom of expression, the Commission identifies “progress”. However, a 2012 EP DG EXPO Policy Department briefing cites Montenegro’s relatively low international ranking on press freedom. It also highlights a backlog of defamation and other court cases against media and journalists. Prime Minister Milo Đukanović said in December 2012 that the government would continue the work on accession negotiations in a responsible way.

Irregularities during elections?

Fraud has been alleged both after the parliamentary elections of October 2012, and the presidential ballot on 7 April 2013. In the former, the Democratic Party of Socialists (DPS), which under Đukanović has governed since 1989, was declared winner. In the latter case, both candidates claimed victory, until the State Electoral Commission declared the incumbent, Filip Vujanović, winner. OSCE observers said that both candidates (who are pro-European) were able to campaign freely, but that campaigning was mixed with state activities. The Commission’s progress report agrees that rules on party and campaign financing should be reinforced. The Commission has asked the country’s authorities to investigate both fraud allegations.

European Parliament position

The draft resolution by Charles Tannock (ECR, UK) on behalf of the Committee on Foreign Affairs (AFET) praises Montenegro’s positive role in regional cooperation, but mentions border issues with its neighbours. AFET calls for a stronger role for the Montenegrin Parliament in the accession negotiations and in improving transparency of state institutions, which would contribute towards the fight against corruption. On funding of political parties and election campaigns, Montenegro should implement the recommendations of the Council of Europe’s Group of States Against Corruption.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Download the EPRS App

EPRS App on Google Play
EPRS App on App Store
What Europe Does For You
EU Legislation in Progress
Topical Digests
EPRS Podcasts

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 3,307 other followers

Disclaimer and Copyright statement

The content of all documents (and articles) contained in this blog is the sole responsibility of the author and any opinions expressed therein do not necessarily represent the official position of the European Parliament. It is addressed to the Members and staff of the EP for their parliamentary work. Reproduction and translation for non-commercial purposes are authorised, provided the source is acknowledged and the European Parliament is given prior notice and sent a copy.

For a comprehensive description of our cookie and data protection policies, please visit Terms and Conditions page.

Copyright © European Union, 2014-2019. All rights reserved.

%d bloggers like this: