you're reading...
Institutional and Legal Affairs, PUBLICATIONS

Freedom of movement for EU public documents

Around 2.5% of the EU population is resident in a Member State (MS) other than that of their origin. In the past decade, increasing numbers of EU citizens have taken advantage of free movement within the internal market, wishing to live, work or study in another MS. However, according to the European Commission, this freedom may be curtailed in practice by the need for European citizens and legal persons to have the host State recognise public documents and certificates from their State of origin. For example, problems are experienced in cases related to driving licences, accessing social services or tax benefits, avoiding double taxation, looking for a job, and getting married or divorced.

International framework

At international level, the 1961 Hague Convention abolishing the requirement of legalisation for foreign public documents (the so-called “Apostille convention”) specifies the modalities through which a document issued in one of the signatory countries can be certified in order to be produced for legal purposes in all the other signatory States. The standardised Apostille, while simpler to obtain than legalisation, still represents a significant administrative burden for citizens.

Current situation within the EU

Freedom of movement for EU public documents

© Alex_Mac / Fotolia

The Convention of 25 May 1987 abolishing the legalisation of public documents among MS has however not entered into force, having been ratified only by eight Member States (seven of which apply the Convention provisionally amongst themselves). As a result, this issue has to be dealt with on a “case by case” basis through a variety of varying bilateral agreements. According to the European Commission, every year, several hundred thousand public documents have to be legalised or certified in order to be recognised in Member States other than that in which they originated. For instance in a cross-border situation, a university institution may require certified copies of school documents, whereas it does not require this for domestic documents. This kind of differentiation creates additional costs, notably when public documents are needed for cross-border or international economic activities. Such burdens for EU citizens who are not nationals of the requesting country are widely seen as incompatible with a common EU area of freedom, security and justice, in which discrimination between EU citizens on the basis of nationality is not allowed. To help overcome this situation, the EU has adopted several sectoral laws, establishing standard forms which do not require national certification (such as the Succession Regulation, European Small Claims Procedure Regulation, and the European Order for Payment Procedure Regulation).

A new general EU framework?

The Commission has submitted to the European Parliament and to the Council a legislative proposal aiming to remove both legalisation and Apostille formalities for a range of public documents (such as birth certicates, or company registration certificates) in situations where they need to be presented in a different MS. This proposal concerns only the formalities required for the presentation of public documents, and does not aim to create an obligation to recognise the content of a given document. Founded on Article 21(1) TFEU (freedom of citizens’ movement) and Article 114(1) TFEU (internal market) the plenary will vote on the first-reading report by the Legal Affairs Committee (rapporteur Bernhard Rapkay, S&D, Germany). The Committee voted to establish a greater number of multilingual standard forms for public documents, and also wants the future Regulation to cover a broader range of public documents than those listed in the Commission proposal, including certain documents of EU institutions, agencies and bodies. With Member States still discussing the proposal, it is unlikely that a first-reading agreement will be possible during the current legislature.

About EPRSauthor

European Parliamentary Research Service of the European Parliament. The EPRS offers the best available research and analytical support to Members of the European Parliament, their staff, parliamentary committees and, of course, to you!

Discussion

No comments yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Download the EPRS App

EPRS App on Google Play
EPRS App on App Store
What Europe Does For You
EU Legislation in Progress
Topical Digests
EPRS Podcasts

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 2,914 other followers

Disclaimer and Copyright statement

The content of all documents (and articles) contained in this blog is the sole responsibility of the author and any opinions expressed therein do not necessarily represent the official position of the European Parliament. It is addressed to the Members and staff of the EP for their parliamentary work. Reproduction and translation for non-commercial purposes are authorised, provided the source is acknowledged and the European Parliament is given prior notice and sent a copy.

For a comprehensive description of our cookie and data protection policies, please visit Terms and Conditions page.

Copyright © European Union, 2014-2018. All rights reserved.

%d bloggers like this: