you're reading...
International Relations, PUBLICATIONS

EU-Indonesia agreement on trade in legal timber

6 language versions available in PDF format
Abkommen zwischen der EU und Indonesien über den Handel mit legalem Holz
Acuerdo UE-Indonesia sobre el comercio de madera legal
Accord entre l’Union européenne et l’Indonésie relatif au commerce du bois d’origine légale
Accordo UE-Indonesia sul commercio di legname legale
Umowa między UE a Indonezją w sprawie handlu legalnie pozyskanym drewnem
EU-Indonesia agreement on trade in legal timber

The EU-Indonesia Forest Law Enforcement, Governance and Trade (FLEGT) Voluntary Partnership Agreement (VPA) was signed on 30 September 2013. It is the first FLEGT VPA the EU has made with an Asian timber-exporting country; VPAs with Malaysia and Vietnam are likely to follow.


EU-Indonesia agreement on trade in legal timber

© WONG SZE FEI / Fotolia

Indonesia hosts the world’s third-largest rainforest after the Amazon and the CongoBasin. Its forestry sector features widespread corruption and has seen rapid deforestation as a result of large-scale illegal logging and conversion of rainforest in carbon-rich peat-lands for palm oil and pulp plantations. Dramatically increasing greenhouse-gas emissions have been the most obvious detrimental consequences. A regulatory environment in major consumer markets prohibiting imports of illegally harvested timber (Japan’s Green Purchasing Law, the US Lacey Act, the EU Timber Regulation, and Australia’s Illegal Logging Prohibition Act) has added to Indonesia’s interest in concluding a VPA with the EU. Indonesia is the EU’s fourth-largest source for tropical wood imports in terms of value. With about 15%, the EU is the second-biggest export destination for Indonesian forest products. Indonesia hopes to boost its EU exports twofold thanks to the VPA.

Purpose of the VPA

The VPA seeks to curb trade in illegal timber by establishing an operator-based licensing system which ensures that all wood products exported from Indonesia to the EU come from verified legal sources. It also aims to contribute to improving forest governance and forest-law enforcement. The VPA includes provisions on supply-chain control, independent auditing, licensing of exports and civil-society monitoring. Indonesia’s timber legality assurance system (SVLK) is intended to certify that export timber was harvested legally and can be imported into the EU under a FLEGT licence. Hence, SVLK-certified timber will automatically comply with EU importers’ due diligence requirements under the EU Timber Regulation in force since March 2013.

Challenges to the VPA’s implementation

The SVLK, which is mandatory for all timber exports, has been implemented since early 2013. But the overall roll out of SVLK certification has been slow, with SMEs criticising the cost for business permits and impact assessments and the potential need for multiple certification. The SVLK’s credibility as a whole could be seriously undermined, as non-SVLK certified timber could enter the supply chain. A case in point is conversion timber. It is produced from legitimate land conversion permits (IPK), which account for large parts of forest logs. Currently, it is allegedly not audited and is said to partly provide a cover for illegal logging. Critics say the SVLK fails to address the unconstitutional practice of issuing permits to companies for disputed customary forestland (previously classified as state forest) in violation of land tenure/use rights of indigenous communities. Monitoring of the SVLK is still difficult, since there appears to be no operational information system with accessible up-to-date forest data and maps. Due to lack of capacity independent monitors lag heavily behind in checking SVLK certifications. Follow up to complaints has been inadequate. Forest law enforcement has remained weak, with illegal logging rarely being prosecuted or sanctioned.

EP position

On 21 January 2014, the Committee on International Trade (rapporteur Yannick Jadot, Verts/ALE, France) unanimously adopted a draft recommendation in favour of the VPA’s conclusion. Despite some shortcomings in SVLK’s functioning, the Committee suggests that the progress made by Indonesia in fighting illegal logging should be commended. Nonetheless, as set out in the accompanying motion for resolution, the EP would expect the country to make further progress, and in particular improve SVLK.

About EPRSauthor

European Parliamentary Research Service of the European Parliament. The EPRS offers the best available research and analytical support to Members of the European Parliament, their staff, parliamentary committees and, of course, to you!


One thought on “EU-Indonesia agreement on trade in legal timber

  1. Why aren’t we doing trade deals with countries that can afford high end goods we export rather than low end economies that will flood our countries with cheap goods that will simply increase the length of European dole queues for those working in the low value economy?

    Posted by Joe Thorpe | February 23, 2014, 19:33

Leave a Reply

Download the EPRS App

EPRS App on Google Play
EPRS App on App Store
What Europe Does For You
EU Legislation in Progress
Topical Digests
EPRS Podcasts

Follow Blog via Email

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 3,544 other subscribers

Disclaimer and Copyright statement

The content of all documents (and articles) contained in this blog is the sole responsibility of the author and any opinions expressed therein do not necessarily represent the official position of the European Parliament. It is addressed to the Members and staff of the EP for their parliamentary work. Reproduction and translation for non-commercial purposes are authorised, provided the source is acknowledged and the European Parliament is given prior notice and sent a copy.

For a comprehensive description of our cookie and data protection policies, please visit Terms and Conditions page.

Copyright © European Union, 2014-2019. All rights reserved.

%d bloggers like this: