you're reading...
Economic and Social Policies, PUBLICATIONS, Structural and Cohesion Policies

Deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure

The development of alternative fuels for transport is essential for reducing the EU’s dependence on crude oil and to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. The European Commission has proposed a directive which requires Member States to foster the deployment of infrastructure for the supply of these alternative energies for road and waterway transport.

Background

Deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure

© Pixel / Fotolia

According to experts, the options with most potential as alternative fuels in road transport include electric batteries (for short/medium distances); compressed gases like hydrogen (fuel cells) and compressed natural gas CNG (intermediate distances) and liquid fuels (e.g. biofuels, liquid natural gas or LNG) for long-distance transport. In waterways, the future lies in compressed hydrogen (inland navigation, small boats), liquid gases (LNG for maritime activities) and liquid biofuels (all vessels). Rail should depend as much as possible on the electric grid, while biofuel-derived jet fuel could substitute for conventional fuel in air transport.

However, alternative fuels in transport still face a number of challenges. A major obstacle is the lack of adequate infrastructure for recharging or refuelling with energy sources which cannot be supplied through the technological channels in place for liquid conventional fuels (94% of the energy used today in European transport is derived from crude oil). This lack of infrastructure for recharging battery packs or refuelling with hydrogen and compressed or liquefied natural gas interacts in a vicious circle with the low numbers of alternative-fuel vehicles: lack of consumers means no investment in refuelling infrastructure, while lack of infrastructure discourages consumers from choosing alternative vehicles. There is also still limited knowledge (or acceptance) of alternative propulsion vehicles among the majority of potential users.

European Commission proposals

In January 2013, the Commission proposed a directive requiring Member States to adopt national policy frameworks for developing the market for alternative fuels and to ensure that minimum infrastructure is set up for their supply in road and water-borne transport. Each Member State should ensure the establishment of a defined minimum number of recharging points for electric vehicles by the end of 2020 (at least 10% of them publicly accessible). Ports should be equipped with shore-side electricity supply for vessels by end-2015. Hydrogen refuelling points should be set up in sufficient number (no further than 300 km apart) to allow hydrogen vehicles to circulate throughout the territory (by 2020 in Member States where this technology has already been introduced). LNG supply should be available for navigation along the core Trans-European Transport (TEN-T) network in maritime ports (2020) and inland ports (2025), and LNG refuelling points should sustain heavy-vehicle road transport along the TEN-T core network (refuelling points at least every 400 km by 2020). By end-2020, Member States should ensure sufficient CNG refuelling points are set up (at least every 150 km) to support CNG vehicles across the EU. This proposal would also require harmonisation of technical specifications of alternative fuels, and common standards for refuelling and electric charging systems, and more information to consumers on compatibility of fuels and vehicles.

European Parliament

This proposal for a directive was referred to the Committee on Transport and Tourism (TRAN) which appointed Carlo Fidanza (EPP, Italy) as rapporteur. The Committee adopted its report on 26 November 2013. On 5 December the Council agreed on a general approach, a position seen by the Commission as less ambitious than its proposal, particularly regarding the timeframe for the infrastructure set-up. After a series of trilogues a compromise was approved by Coreper and endorsed by the TRAN Committee on 1 April; the EP has now to confirm the text at first reading.

About EPRSauthor

European Parliamentary Research Service of the European Parliament. The EPRS offers the best available research and analytical support to Members of the European Parliament, their staff, parliamentary committees and, of course, to you!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Download the EPRS App

EPRS App on Google Play
EPRS App on App Store
What Europe Does For You
EU Legislation in Progress
Topical Digests
EPRS Podcasts

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 3,088 other followers

Disclaimer and Copyright statement

The content of all documents (and articles) contained in this blog is the sole responsibility of the author and any opinions expressed therein do not necessarily represent the official position of the European Parliament. It is addressed to the Members and staff of the EP for their parliamentary work. Reproduction and translation for non-commercial purposes are authorised, provided the source is acknowledged and the European Parliament is given prior notice and sent a copy.

For a comprehensive description of our cookie and data protection policies, please visit Terms and Conditions page.

Copyright © European Union, 2014-2019. All rights reserved.

%d bloggers like this: