you're reading...
Economic and Social Policies, PUBLICATIONS

CRD4: proposals for safer financial firms

6 language versions available in PDF formatCRD4: Vorschläge für sicherere Finanzinstitute
DRC IV: propuestas para unas empresas financieras más seguras
CRD4: propositions pour renforcer la sécurité des établissements financiers
CRD4: proposte per imprese finanziarie più sicure
Pakiet CRD4: wnioski w sprawie bezpieczniejszych przedsiębiorstw finansowych
CRD4: proposals for safer financial firms

The CRD4 package (a draft Regulation and Directive to replace the existing Capital Requirements Directives) is a series of measures to make banks etc. in the EU more resilient in crisis situations.

The draft Regulation proposes four main areas for improvement. The two most important cover the quality and quantity of reserves and liquidity measures. These aim to ensure that banks will have surer access to funds if needed. The other two are to control excessive leverage (i.e. borrowing) and protect against problems with counterparties.

Overview

The EU has already amended the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD) since the financial crisis, to avoid a repeat.

This package, which is an important part of a wider improvement plan, would implement into EU law “Basel III”, an international regulatory framework for banks agreed in late 2010.

The draft Regulation relates to financial firms: banks and investment firms.

Main measures

© leroy131 / Fotolia

© leroy131 / Fotolia

1. Improved capital

Some banks had to be rescued during the 2008 crisis because their capital (reserves of funds) was of poor quality and lost value.

The proposal keeps the existing 8% of core reserves but requires a greater proportion of higher quality assets in this 8%.

It also adds potential additional reserves:

  • A capital conservation buffer, which restricts an institution’s payments (such as dividends) if its capital ratios fall.
  • A counter-cyclical reserve to build up an extra cushion in times of growth.

Further surcharges will be added for global systemically important financial institutions (SIFIs) with the option to add a similar buffer for national SIFIs. And regulatory reviews may identify other risks that will require additional capital.

2. Liquidity risk management practices

Liquidity means adequate cash resources to meet demand. This was often shown to be lacking in the crisis, because of inadequate practices such as using short-term funding for long-term needs.

CRD4 would address this weakness through a Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR). The proposed LCR would require a firm to match its reserve of high quality liquid assets such as cash with its representative net outflows over 30 days.

3. Counterparty credit risk occurs whenever a financial transaction occurs with a third-party organisation. Proposals include:

  • An additional capital charge where there is a deterioration in the creditworthiness of a counterparty
  • Incentives to conduct financial transactions through standard (“regulated”) financial exchanges

4. The proposals also include a leverage ratio to measure and restrict its build-up.

The Regulation aims for an EU-wide “Single rule book” (i.e. harmonisation) except in specific, well-defined exceptions.

Reactions

The European Parliamentary Financial Services Forum notes general support for CRD4. It says that the reserve asset requirements will impact on banks’ lending activities, with implications for the real economy.

CEPS, a policy think-tank, is concerned about regulators relying on banks’ own risk management models for capital-requirement calculations, and also about supervisors’ lack of accountability.

Leave a Reply

Download the EPRS App

EPRS App on Google Play
EPRS App on App Store
What Europe Does For You
EU Legislation in Progress
Topical Digests
EPRS Podcasts

Follow Blog via Email

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 3,544 other subscribers

Disclaimer and Copyright statement

The content of all documents (and articles) contained in this blog is the sole responsibility of the author and any opinions expressed therein do not necessarily represent the official position of the European Parliament. It is addressed to the Members and staff of the EP for their parliamentary work. Reproduction and translation for non-commercial purposes are authorised, provided the source is acknowledged and the European Parliament is given prior notice and sent a copy.

For a comprehensive description of our cookie and data protection policies, please visit Terms and Conditions page.

Copyright © European Union, 2014-2019. All rights reserved.

%d bloggers like this: