you're reading...
Institutional and Legal Affairs, PUBLICATIONS

Changed rules for qualified majority voting in the Council of the EU

Written by Eva-Maria Poptcheva and Conall Devaney

From 1 November 2014, decisions in the Council of the EU (Council of Ministers) requiring a ‘qualified majority’ are adopted by means of the new ‘double majority’. The change lowers the threshold required for adoption by Council, and is intended to increase the speed and efficiency of Council decision-making and to make it more transparent and legitimate.

The old weighted-vote system

The voting system for Council decisions following the 2001 Nice Treaty was intended to adapt to the new weighting of votes which enlargement from 15 to 25 Member States would entail. Qualified majority voting (QMV) was redefined to introduce a combined threshold for votes to pass. The three criteria for decisions to be adopted were 74% of Member States’ weighted votes, cast by a majority of Member States, and, optionally, a check that the majority represented 62% of the EU’s total population. The main criticism levelled at this system was that the threshold for Member States’ approval was simply too high, leading to the problem of gridlock. Ultimately it meant that generally only proposals of limited ambition could gain broad support across the Council and be adopted.

The Lisbon Treaty and the new qualified majority

EU Council

© European Union / Council of the EU

In order to overcome these drawbacks, and increase legitimacy, in line with the ‘one citizen – one vote’ principle, the European Convention proposed moving to a double-majority method. The new voting method, included in the EU Constitutional Treaty, was confirmed in the Lisbon Treaty (Article 16 TEU/ Article 238 TFEU) although slightly modified. In contrast to the previous majority rules, which are said to have better protected smaller and medium-sized Member States, the new system focuses on the demographic weight of Member States. The adoption of acts by the Council now requires the approval of 55% of Member States (16) (72% if the act has not been proposed by the Commission), which must represent at least 65% of the EU’s population (currently approximately 328.6 million of a total 505.5 million). To limit the possibility of larger states joining together to stop proposals, a blocking coalition must include at least four Member States representing at least 35% of the EU’s overall population. In cases where not all Member States participate in voting (e.g. acts adopted only by euro area or Schengen Member States, or within enhanced cooperation), the qualified majority is calculated only on the basis of the participating Member States. Until 31 March 2017 any member of the Council can request, on a case-by-case basis, that the old voting rules  be applied.

Winners and Losers?

The new voting method aims to strike a balance between legitimacy and efficiency. However, commentators agree that medium-sized and smaller Member States now have less weight in the Council. Larger Member States such as Germany, France, and the UK on the other hand are seen as the main beneficiaries of the change. Postponing the introduction of the new system for five years after the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty enabled reluctant Member States to agree to the new Treaty.

The new rules could be seen as reducing in the future the likelihood of Council decisions being taken collectively, leading more often to individual Member States or groups being outvoted. However, analyses show that despite qualified majority, the greater part of Council decisions (some 80%) are still adopted by consensus. This trend is expected to continue with the new rules in place. The formal voting rules could however speed up the negotiation process prior to Council decisions taken by consensus, since fewer Member States will need to be persuaded to create a de facto majority during the bargaining process.

The tables show the Member States’ populations as of 1 November, and their voting power under the old and new voting systems, in both the EU and the euro area. The graph illustrates the changes in Member States’ voting power, in percentage points.

Comparison of voting weights prior to and after 1 November 2014

Comparison of voting weights prior to and after 1 November 2014

Council Voting weights in the EU and euro area

Council Voting weights in the EU and euro area

About EPRS Admin

European Parliamentary Research Service

Discussion

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Pingback: We need to STAY | Tina Olaru Blog - June 20, 2016

  2. Pingback: Reasons to be leaving: Part 2 – Democracy | Lion & Unicorn - March 22, 2016

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

EU’s refugee crisis
EU Legislation in Progress
Topical Digests
EPRS Podcasts

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 1,881 other followers

Disclaimer and Copyright statement

The content of all documents (and articles) contained in this blog is the sole responsibility of the author and any opinions expressed therein do not necessarily represent the official position of the European Parliament. It is addressed to the Members and staff of the EP for their parliamentary work. Reproduction and translation for non-commercial purposes are authorised, provided the source is acknowledged and the European Parliament is given prior notice and sent a copy. Copyright © European Union, 2014. All rights reserved

%d bloggers like this: