you're reading...
BLOG, Institutional and Legal Affairs

Testing times for Schengen [Policy podcast]

Written by Alexandra Gatto, Pierre Goudin, Risto Nieminen,

Map of Schengen

Map of Schengen

Over the years, the Schengen system has decidedly brought important economic benefits. The combination of a rising number of asylum-seekers, increasing migratory pressure, security concerns and a fragile economic recovery has put the Schengen area under stress, and called into question its functioning. A ‘wave-through’ approach applied by some Member States led to the creation of a route through the Western Balkans, allowing mixed flows of asylum-seekers and economic migrants to travel across external and internal EU borders. In response, several Member States reintroduced temporary internal border controls to manage increasing flows of entrants. Over the past year, several Schengen countries have temporarily reintroduced controls and serious deficiencies in the application of the Schengen acquis may trigger suspension from Schengen of one Member State. The long-term suspension of Schengen, however, is not foreseen in the current legal framework. The effectiveness of such a measure in terms of addressing the migratory challenge is questionable if not matched with the strengthening of common external border controls, a revision of the Dublin system and the reinforcement of the Common Asylum System. Suspending Schengen may also entail the weakening of police and judicial cooperation on terrorism and organised crime.

Listen to podcast: Schengen area [Policy podcast]

Economic impact of Schengen

In economic terms, re-establishing border controls would hinder intra-European trade and the free movement of people, goods and services. Three main impacts can be identified:

– first, direct costs: the highest and most immediate impact of border controls would be felt by the road haulage sector (€1.7 to 7.5 billion each year), but also by commuting workers (there are 1.7 million workers in the EU who cross a border every day to go to their work), by tourism (between €10 and 20 billion per year), and by the public sector´s finances (more staff would be needed to carry out checks at the borders);

– then, indirect costs, such as a decrease in cross-border movements, a loss of trust by citizens, or even a loss of confidence in the Euro, leading to less foreign investments. Therefore, by 2025 the loss in economic performance of the EU could be between €500 and 1 400 billion;

– finally, a failure of Schengen would also reduce the future benefits of the Single Market and EU integration. Europe is indeed an open economic area with considerable amount of intra-EU trade flows, and thus re-introduction of border controls would affect the whole EU, leading in particular to greater differences in regional job markets and more uneven economic development, including of property prices. Some countries would be more affected. Such a situation could cost the EU economy more than €100 billion in the long term.

EPRS Policy Podcasts are available to download on iTunes.

Despite the challenges it is currently facing, the Schengen area remains one of the great achievements of the EU. A Roadmap to bring Schengen back to functioning by the end of 2016 has been laid down by the European Commission. More extensive reforms however, may be required in the longer term to preserve its benefits on EU’s economy, security and free movement.

Read the publication behind this podcast: The economic impact of suspending Schengen (At a glance, March 2016)

Annex Scorecard – Impact of the suspension of Schengen

Annex Scorecard – Impact of the suspension of Schengen




4 thoughts on “Testing times for Schengen [Policy podcast]

  1. The whole Schengen discussion in view of the recent migrant crisis and terrorist activities is a false debate. Both migrant crisis and terrorist activities would have taken place regardless of Schengen. The discussion is now on the political agenda, because anti-European national politicians used it to support their own separate agenda. And to be clear … the migrant crisis is a crisis for the migrants, not for Europe.


    Posted by Stefan Gijssels (@StefanGijssels) | April 8, 2016, 18:53
  2. It is an absolute shame that the people and governments responsible for the creation of Schengen did not bother to think through the consequences in terms of what it would mean to the external Schengen border. No excuse to say that the migrants were not in focus at the time. It is just sloppy management and preparation which now causes a lot of problems in all the member states. Our current politicians are happy to claim victory, particularly in their home countries but shy away from more difficult decisions such as outer border protection which should have been self evident.


    Posted by Prinselaar | April 7, 2016, 18:42


  1. Pingback: Testing times for Schengen [Policy podcast] | - April 8, 2016

  2. Pingback: Alexandra Gatto, Pierre Goudin, Risto Nieminen, Testing Times For Schengen | Afaceri juridice europene - European Legal Affairs. blog - April 7, 2016

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Download the EPRS App

EPRS App on Google Play
EPRS App on App Store
What Europe Does For You
EU Legislation in Progress
Topical Digests
EPRS Podcasts

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 3,513 other followers

RSS Link to Members’ Research Service

Disclaimer and Copyright statement

The content of all documents (and articles) contained in this blog is the sole responsibility of the author and any opinions expressed therein do not necessarily represent the official position of the European Parliament. It is addressed to the Members and staff of the EP for their parliamentary work. Reproduction and translation for non-commercial purposes are authorised, provided the source is acknowledged and the European Parliament is given prior notice and sent a copy.

For a comprehensive description of our cookie and data protection policies, please visit Terms and Conditions page.

Copyright © European Union, 2014-2019. All rights reserved.

%d bloggers like this: