you're reading...
Economic and Social Policies, PUBLICATIONS

Shale gas in Europe: prospects and risks

6 language versions available in pdf format
Schiefergas in Europa: Möglichkeiten und Risiken
El gas de esquisto en Europa: perspectivas y riesgos
Gaz de schiste en Europe: risques et perspectives
Il gas di scisto in Europa: le prospettive e i rischi
Gaz łupkowy w Europie. Perspektywy i zagrożenia
Shale gas in Europe: prospects and risks

Shale gas has helped the US increase its domestic energy supply and reduce its depen­dence on imports. In Europe, the exploitation of shale gas is just starting, and only in some countries. Shale gas may reduce reliance on external gas supplies, but there are concerns about environ­mental impacts and reduced investment in renewable energies. It remains to be seen to what extent Europe can benefit from shale gas while meeting climate targets and environ­mental standards.

US shale gas revolution

Shale gas has transformed the energy market in the US over the past decade. Jobs have been created, low gas prices have increased industrial competiveness, and switching electricity generation from coal to gas has reduced carbon emissions.

Various factors have contributed to the success of shale gas in the US: independent drilling companies, favourable geology, fully liberalised energy markets, accessible gas pipeline networks, low population density, and property rights that favour land-owners.


Shale gas

Copyright Laurie Barr. Used under
licence from

Economic: The development of new gas resources has the potential to increase energy supply, lower prices, and improve energy security. A European Commission study concludes that shale gas could help avoid increasing dependence on imports, but would not make the EU self-sufficient in gas.

Environmental: Shale gas is extracted by horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing – blasting underground rock with large volumes of water mixed with sand and chemicals. Toxic chemicals or methane can leak into ground water if a well is not properly constructed. A 2011 EP Policy Department study recommends restricting the number of chemicals allowed. Shale gas extraction takes up land and causes traffic, noise and wastewater (which may however be re-used). Hydraulic fracturing may provoke minor earthquakes. A study carried out for the European Commission on environ­mental and health risks (2012) recommends assessing the adequacy of current legislation.

Climate impacts of shale gas are comparable to those of conventional gas, provided that methane leaks can be minimised. By replacing carbon-rich coal, gas can have a key role in decarbonising the economy, according to the European Commission’s 2050 Energy Roadmap. On the other hand, higher carbon emissions would result if shale gas develop­ments lead to increased gas consumption or to reduced investments in renewable energies.

Shale gas in the EU

The development of shale gas extraction in the EU is the responsibility of Member States. Some have permitted shale gas ex­ploration: Poland, Austria, Germany, Sweden, the Netherlands and the UK. On the other hand, Bulgaria, France and Romania have a ban or moratorium on shale gas development.

European shale gas resources are estimated at 16 trillion m3, compared to 20 trillion m3 for the US. However, it will take more exploration to find out how much can be extracted at reasonable cost. If development goes ahead, Europe could start producing gas from shale around the end of this decade.


The EP’s ITRE committee (rapporteur Niki Tsavela, EFD, Greece) calls on Member States to adopt a robust regulatory framework. The ENVI committee (Bogusław Sonik, EPP, Poland) emphasises the need for risk management. Both committees stress the importance of transparency and public consultation.

Environmental NGOs, including Greenpeace and Friends of the Earth, oppose shale gas because of its greenhouse gas emissions and environmental risks. The International Energy Agency has proposed ‘golden rules’ that would address public unease about land use, noise, water pollution and environmental damage.

Shell CEO Peter Voserconsiders the European potential for shale gas as limited due to legis­lation, regulation and high population density.


4 thoughts on “Shale gas in Europe: prospects and risks

  1. Russia vs Turkey : The Geopolitics of the South & the Turk Stream Pipelines

    Posted by Iakovos Alhadeff | May 30, 2015, 14:03


  1. Pingback: Time Is Running Out « - January 13, 2013

  2. Pingback: The week on the EP’s Library blog: Best of 2012 « Library of the European Parliament - December 28, 2012

  3. Pingback: The week on the EP Library’s blog: EP Plenary Session in a nutshell « Library of the European Parliament - November 23, 2012

Leave a Reply

Download the EPRS App

EPRS App on Google Play
EPRS App on App Store
What Europe Does For You
EU Legislation in Progress
Topical Digests
EPRS Podcasts

Follow Blog via Email

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 3,543 other subscribers

Disclaimer and Copyright statement

The content of all documents (and articles) contained in this blog is the sole responsibility of the author and any opinions expressed therein do not necessarily represent the official position of the European Parliament. It is addressed to the Members and staff of the EP for their parliamentary work. Reproduction and translation for non-commercial purposes are authorised, provided the source is acknowledged and the European Parliament is given prior notice and sent a copy.

For a comprehensive description of our cookie and data protection policies, please visit Terms and Conditions page.

Copyright © European Union, 2014-2019. All rights reserved.

%d bloggers like this: