EPRSLibrary By / November 20, 2012

EU ban on shark finning

6 language versions available EU-Verbot des Hai-Finning Prohibición del cercenamiento de aletas de tiburón en la UE Interdiction de l’Union…

Copyright Vladimir Kirienko. Used under licence from Shutterstock.com
6 language versions available
EU-Verbot des Hai-Finning
Prohibición del cercenamiento de aletas de tiburón en la UE
Interdiction de l’Union concernant l’enlèvement des nageoires de requins
Divieto di asportazione delle pinne di squalo imposto dall’Unione europea
Unijny zakaz obcinania płetw rekinom
EU ban on shark finning

Some shark species have become threatened in recent years, including due to increased demand for shark products, in particular fins. Shark finning is the practice of removing fins and discarding the rest of the body at sea. Existing EU legislation bans shark finning, but allows for fins to be removed aboard vessels under certain conditions through Special Fishing Permits. The Commission proposes that this should no longer be possible.


Shark finning
Copyright Vladimir Kirienko. Used under
licence from Shutterstock.com

Many shark species are considered vulnerable to over-exploitation due to the fact that they grow slowly, mature at a late age, and have low rates of reproduction. The practice of shark finning – cutting off a shark’s fins and discarding the body at sea – is driven by the fact that shark fins are highly valuable as opposed to shark carcasses. Shark fins are reported to sell for between US$20 and 90 (€15-70) per kilo­gramme on the Asian market, which is higher than the retail price of shark meat. Experts claim that shark finning is one of the factors that contribute to the pressure on shark populations. Finning and discard of shark carcasses is also considered a public concern because of the perceived cruelty to sharks if they are finned alive.

The EU is a major actor in global shark product markets. The EU’s global shark catches rank second, after Indonesia (see Fig. 1).The EU has made several international commitments to protect sharks, in line with the Food and Agriculture Organisation Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries, and in particular under the International Plan of Action on Sharks (IPOA-Sharks). IPOA-Sharks was the basis for the 2009 Commission Communication on an EU Action Plan for the Conservation and Management of Sharks, in which the EU committed itself to adopt all necessary measures for the conservation of sharks and to minimise waste and discards from shark catches.

Fig. 1 – Shark catches (tonnes/year) by major fishing nations 2000-2008

Source: FAO Fishstat as quoted in Shark fins in Europe, S. Fowler, B. Séret.

Current situation

Although an EU shark finning ban was introduced in 2003, the relevant Regulation allows exemptions under certain conditions to vessels processing fish on board. Special Fishing Permits (SFP) can be delivered by Member States, allowing fins to be removed on board if all parts of the shark are retained. In this case, fins and bodies can be landed in different ports, but that makes controls difficult, given the varying levels of enforcement in ports around the world where such landings may take place. Conservationists argue that a number of loop-holes prevent the current Regulation from being fully effective. To date, the largest numbers of SFPs have been issued to Spanish and Portuguese longliners (respectively 1266 and 145 for the period 2004-2010). In the past, SFPs have been delivered by the UK, Germany and Lithuania, but since 2009, this is no longer the case.

Commission proposal

The new Commission proposal results from a public consultation and foresees that all vessels fishing in EU waters and all EU vessels fishing anywhere in the world will have to land sharks with their fins still attached. To facilitate storage and handling onboard, fishermen will be permitted to slice partly through each fin and fold it against the carcass of the shark.

Fisheries committee views

In committee, MEPs voted to rule out exceptions allowing for SFPs, and thus oblige all vessels to land any sharks with their fins “naturally attached”. The draft reportwas approved with 11 votes in favour, 10 against and 3 abstentions.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: