you're reading...
Institutional and Legal Affairs, International Relations, PUBLICATIONS

Republika Srpska

Republika Srpska 

The Dayton Peace Agreement modified the structure of Bosnia and Herzegovina. It created two entities – the Federation of BiH  (51% of the territory, predominantly inhabited by Bosniaks, but also by Bosnian Croats) and the Republika Srpska (49% of the territory, with a majority of Bosnian Serbs) – as well as the Brcko District, which is a self-governing unit under the jurisdiction of the state.
The Republika Srpska (RS) has a centralised structure, with its own National AssemblyGovernment and Constitutional Court. In October 2013, according to preliminary results of the 2013 census, RS had an estimated population of 1 326 991, data on ethnicity will be published in 2014.  The net average salary in 2012 was about 400 euros. In 2012 the activity rate was 47.4% and the unemployment rate 25.6%.

Striving for more autonomy

Republika Srpska

© lesniewski / Fotolia

The parties representing the constituent peoples have conflicting policies. Bosniak political parties oppose regionalisation of state-level powers and see the Dayton constitution only as a step towards a stronger state-level. Croat political parties want to preserve the competences at the Canton level in the Federation of BiH and to achieve rights for Croats equal to those of the two other constituent peoples. The temporary constitutional arrangements that provide mechanisms protecting the interests of the constituent peoples or of the entities may be used to prevent any change.

Since the mid-2000s, Serb parties have agreed on the transfer of competences – the entities should keep as much autonomy as possible or even demand the return of competences previously transferred to the federal level. The RS president, Milorad Dodik—whose Alliance of Independent Social Democrats (SNSD) has been dominating the entity’s government for years, aims to recover some powers transferred in the first half of the 2000s from the entity to the state-level.
Dodik questions the authority of both the EUSR/OHR and the central state. This is one reason why the US and other Western powers refuse to give a date for the closure of the Office of the High Representative (OHR). He also questions the functioning of BiH as a state and repeatedly talks of the possibility of a “peaceful dissolution of Bosnia and Herzegovina“. In May 2011, only after a meeting with EU HR/VP Catherine Ashton, RS President Dodik agreed to cancel a referendum, which would have challenged the jurisdiction of the two highest judicial institutions of BiH  on RS territory. Polls have shown that a majority in RS supports independance.

Local Elections 7 Oct 2012

SNSD lost 26 mayoral posts. The main winner was the Serb Democratic Party (SDS), a right-wing party which doubled its number of mayoral seats. The success of the SDS has raised eyebrows because SDS members (Radovan Karadžić, Biljana Plavšić…) played an important role in the 1992-1995 Bosnian War, and have been found guilty of crimes against humanity in international courts. The SDS isconsidered to be even more nationalist than the SNSD. The vote was particularly tense in Srebrenica, where the Serb candidate came from SDS, but eventually the Bosniak party won.

2013 Progress report

The Government of Republika Srpska’s administrative capacity to monitor EU-related legislation is considered satisfactory, but coordination and cooperation with the State-level and Federation Governments need to improve. The rule of law chapter of the Commission’s 2013 Progress Report criticises the non-removal of Article 11(2) of the Constitution (death penalty).

About EPRSauthor

European Parliamentary Research Service of the European Parliament. The EPRS offers the best available research and analytical support to Members of the European Parliament, their staff, parliamentary committees and, of course, to you!



  1. Pingback: Rejsebrev: Sarajevo er overvældende på godt og ondt - POV - March 21, 2017

  2. Pingback: In focus week on the Western Balkans | European Parliamentary Research Service - February 10, 2014

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Download the EPRS App

EPRS App on Google Play
EPRS App on App Store
What Europe Does For You
EU Legislation in Progress
Topical Digests
EPRS Podcasts

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 3,386 other followers

Disclaimer and Copyright statement

The content of all documents (and articles) contained in this blog is the sole responsibility of the author and any opinions expressed therein do not necessarily represent the official position of the European Parliament. It is addressed to the Members and staff of the EP for their parliamentary work. Reproduction and translation for non-commercial purposes are authorised, provided the source is acknowledged and the European Parliament is given prior notice and sent a copy.

For a comprehensive description of our cookie and data protection policies, please visit Terms and Conditions page.

Copyright © European Union, 2014-2019. All rights reserved.

%d bloggers like this: