you're reading...
EU Financing / Budgetary Affairs, PUBLICATIONS

Review of the ‘six-pack’ and ‘two-pack’

Written by Angelos Delivorias
6 language versions available in PDF format

Überarbeitung des „Sixpack“ und des „Twopack“

Revisión del paquete legislativo de gobernanza económica y del paquete legislativo sobre supervisión presupuestaria

Réexamen du “six-pack” et du “two-pack”

Riesame del “six-pack” e del “two-pack”

Przegląd sześciopaku i dwupaku

Review of the ‘six-pack’ and ‘two-pack’

The legislative measures introduced with the ‘six-pack’ and the ‘two-pack’ develop and strengthen the Stability and Growth Pact, the framework for coordination of Member States’ fiscal policies within the broader sphere of economic governance.

Enhanced fiscal and macroeconomic surveillance

The Regulations and Directive that form the ‘six-pack’ were introduced in 2011 with the ambition of reducing macroeconomic imbalances and ensuring the viability of national finances through either preventive or corrective actions. They apply to all Member States, although some rules (e.g. those relating to sanctions) apply only to the euro area. They:

  • Review of the 'six-pack' and 'two-pack'

    © tashatuvango / Fotolia

    bring the surveillance of fiscal and economic policies under the European Semester, to ensure that the policy advice given to Member States is consistent;

  • introduce an expenditure benchmark, linked to a country’s medium-term budgetary objective (MTO), that places a cap on the annual growth of a country’s expenditure;
  • enhance country surveillance, through examining not only countries with current account deficits, but also those with current account surpluses;
  • permit the excessive deficit procedure to be opened on the sole basis of the debt criterion (60% of GDP);
  • introduce a macroeconomic imbalance procedure relying on an early-warning system and enforcement regime, and allows the Commission and the Council to insert preventive recommendations in the country-specific recommendations, before the imbalances of a Member State become too large, or if this fails, to open an excessive imbalance procedure and oblige it to follow a corrective action plan;
  • Impose graduated financial sanctions, which may eventually reach 0.5% of GDP.

Further budgetary coordination

The Regulations of the ‘two-pack’ were introduced in 2013. They are based on, and enhance, the six-pack reforms, by improving budgetary coordination through the introduction of a common budgetary timeline and common budgetary rules for Member States, and by introducing a system of enhanced surveillance for those Member States experiencing serious difficulties with financial stability, receiving financial assistance, or emerging from adjustment programmes.

European Parliament’s contribution to their design

The European Parliament amended the original proposed texts with the aim of making them more transparent, to avoid the reduction of government deficit and debt from weakening a Member State’s growth and employment prospects, and to prevent reforms harming investments with growth potential or fundamental policies such as education and healthcare.

The European Commission’s review

On 28 November, the Commission adopted a communication in which it presents its review of the Regulations in the ‘six-pack’ and ‘two-pack’. Although the Commission expresses its general satisfaction with the way the Regulations helped the EU weather the economic crisis, it notes that, at this stage, the review cannot be comprehensive because the time since the entry into force of the rules is too short. Additionally, the Commission notes that the effectiveness of the Regulations needs to be further tested, as until now they have been applied only under strained economic conditions, whereas the preventive arm of the packs also needs to be tested under normal conditions. Therefore, the Commission notes, the communication is meant to serve as an initial basis for examination, and the Commission intends to enrich it after discussing it further with the European Parliament.

Discussion

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Pingback: How Not to Fix Europe – Jacobin Dev - October 11, 2016

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Download the EPRS App

EPRS App on Google Play
EPRS App on App Store
What Europe Does For You
EU Legislation in Progress
Topical Digests
EPRS Podcasts

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 2,973 other followers

RSS Link to Members’ Research Service

Disclaimer and Copyright statement

The content of all documents (and articles) contained in this blog is the sole responsibility of the author and any opinions expressed therein do not necessarily represent the official position of the European Parliament. It is addressed to the Members and staff of the EP for their parliamentary work. Reproduction and translation for non-commercial purposes are authorised, provided the source is acknowledged and the European Parliament is given prior notice and sent a copy.

For a comprehensive description of our cookie and data protection policies, please visit Terms and Conditions page.

Copyright © European Union, 2014-2019. All rights reserved.

%d bloggers like this: