you're reading...
International Relations, PUBLICATIONS

Ukraine after Minsk II: the next level

Written by Naja Bentzen and Giulio Sabbati
Ukraine after Minsk II: the next level

© peteri / Fotolia

One month after leaders from France, Germany, Ukraine and Russia reached a 13-point peace agreement in Minsk on 12 February 2015 – Minsk II, a follow-up to the September 2014 Minsk Protocol – the ceasefire is shaky, although it has at least reduced the number of deaths in combat, and the pressure on the international community to act continues.

While Russia denies accusations that it has been sending troops and weapons to support separatists in Ukraine’s east, the undeclared ‘hybrid war’ is developing on all fronts. In the face of a shaky ceasefire and Ukraine’s crumbling economy, the EU, the US and major international actors are discussing possible political, military, and economic responses to the deteriorating crisis. At the same time, EU Member States and NATO are stepping up efforts to counter Russia’s ‘information warfare’.

The on-going crisis in Ukraine erupted after former President Viktor Yanukovych refused to sign an Association Agreement with the EU in November 2013 and sought closer ties to Russia. Russia’s active role in the eastern Ukraine crisis has exposed divides in the EU and the international community on how to react to hybrid threats. It comes at a time when the effectiveness of the EU’s Neighbourhood Policy, including the Eastern Partnership, is being questioned.

This briefing is a follow-up to the 12 February 2015 briefing ‘Minsk peace agreement: still to be consolidated on the ground’ .

Read this Briefing on Ukraine after Minsk II: the next level in PDF

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

 

Discussion

4 thoughts on “Ukraine after Minsk II: the next level

  1. In accordance with our moderation policy we have removed one comment on this post. It included insulting elements: https://epthinktank.eu/about/

    Like

    Posted by EPRSAdmin | March 19, 2015, 10:28
  2. I apologise for cherry-picking, but on p. 3 you refer to Lamberto Zanieri who seemingly stated that ‘that OSCE observers already operating on the ground cannot fully confirm withdrawal on both sides as they do not have access to all relevant locations’. Your interpretation of Zanieri’s words is misleading. In the hyperlink to Reuters you provide in no way Zanieri referred to the ‘both sides’. And I very much doubt that you can find evidence elsewhere that the Ukrainian governemnt hinders OSCE observers’ access to the areas under its own control.

    Like

    Posted by Iulian Romanyshyn | March 18, 2015, 20:19
    • Thank you for your comment. The sentence in the text that you refer to is by no means a direct quotation, and is not indicated as such. In the Reuters interview, Zannier explains the limits the OSCE experiences regarding the monitoring. He states that “My main problem in this moment is not the numbers (of OSCE observers), it’s the access”, adding that “If they (the observers) had more access, I could get more out of them. That is really my challenge.” The assessment that the limited access hampers the monitoring of the withdrawal, thus making it hard to assess the development, is backed up by other sources, for example: OSCE Says Heavy Weapons Moving in Ukraine, but Unsure of Withdrawal (WSJ, 27 February 2015).

      Like

      Posted by EPRSAdmin | March 19, 2015, 10:29

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Pingback: From external threats to taxes – March II plenary session | European Parliamentary Research Service - March 23, 2015

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Download the EPRS App

EPRS App on Google Play
EPRS App on App Store
What Europe Does For You
EU Legislation in Progress
Topical Digests
EPRS Podcasts

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 3,118 other followers

RSS Link to Members’ Research Service

Disclaimer and Copyright statement

The content of all documents (and articles) contained in this blog is the sole responsibility of the author and any opinions expressed therein do not necessarily represent the official position of the European Parliament. It is addressed to the Members and staff of the EP for their parliamentary work. Reproduction and translation for non-commercial purposes are authorised, provided the source is acknowledged and the European Parliament is given prior notice and sent a copy.

For a comprehensive description of our cookie and data protection policies, please visit Terms and Conditions page.

Copyright © European Union, 2014-2019. All rights reserved.

%d bloggers like this: