you're reading...
International Relations, PUBLICATIONS

Safety of nuclear installations in Belarus [Plenary Podcast]

Written by Naja Bentzen,

Thirty years after the Chernobyl accident in neighbouring Ukraine, Belarus is building its first nuclear power plant (NPP). The first unit is set to become operational in 2018 with Russian assistance. However, as the project advances, safety concerns are mounting.

Belarus to realise nuclear power aspirations with help from Russia

EU-Russia energy relations – stuck together?

© V. Yakobchuk / Fotolia

The aftermath of the 1986 Chernobyl disaster in Ukraine – which contaminated nearly a quarter of Belarus but remains a taboo subject in the totalitarian system to this day – stalled Minsk’s own budding nuclear aspirations for decades. In 2006, however, the government approved plans to build Belarus’s first NPP. Ostrovets, some 50 km east of Lithuania’s capital, was chosen as the site in 2008, confirmed by presidential decree in 2011. In 2009, Minsk announced that Russian company Atomstroyexport would be the general contractor. The first concrete was poured in 2013. Russia is to deliver an innovative VVER 1200 reactor by the end of 2016. It will be cooled with water from the river Neris, which flows downstream through Vilnius. Unit 1 is to be operational in 2018; unit 2 in 2020. Two more units are proposed for operation by 2025.

Listen to podcast: Safety of nuclear installations in Belarus [Plenary podcast]

Nuclear energy – the answer to Belarus’s energy dependence on Russia?

Belarus is acutely dependent on Russian energy. Some 90% of Belarusian gas imports come from Russia. Belarusian heavy industries use energy-hungry Soviet-era technologies, and Belarusian citizens have become used to artificially low energy prices. Against this backdrop and in anticipation of the commissioning of the Ostrovets NPP, President Alexander Lukashenko in April 2016 urged citizens to choose electric energy over oil and gas whenever possible, pointing out that ‘gas and oil will be more expensive, while electricity will become cheaper’. While Minsk claims that the NPP will reduce the country’s energy dependence on Russia, critics argue that Belarus – whose state-run economy is struggling – will remain dependent on Russia: the NPP is not only being built by Russian companies, Moscow is also financing the US$22 billion project.

The construction of Ostrovets NPP sparks international concern

While all domestic opposition to the NPP is muted by Belarus’s autocratic president, Lithuania is openly accusing Belarus of violating the United Nations’ Espoo and Aarhus Conventions, by failing to complete an environmental impact assessment, notify Lithuania about the project and inform the public about the impact on the river Neris and on drinking water in Lithuania. In 2014, the parties to the Espoo Convention found that Minsk had failed to meet some of its obligations in the construction of the NPP. In March 2016, the body suggested that an international inquiry commission help resolve the dispute. Following an incident on 8 April (confirmed by Minsk on 10 May only), Lithuania renewed its calls for stress tests, urging the International Atomic Energy Agency to ensure compliance with international safety requirements.

Following the 2011 Fukushima nuclear accident, the European Council in March 2011 requested stress tests of all EU NPPs. In this context, Belarus agreed to conduct nuclear reactor stress tests for its future NPP, using the European Nuclear Safety Regulators Group model. In its 2013 resolution on EU policy towards Belarus (2013/2036(INI)), the European Parliament called on Belarus to ‘enforce the highest international safety standards and a truly independent environmental impact assessment for the construction and operation of all power plants’ in compliance with the Espoo and Aarhus Conventions, and following its 2011 pledge to undertake stress tests.

Under the 2015 Action Programme for Nuclear Safety Cooperation, the EU contributed €1 million to strengthen the capabilities of the Belarusian Nuclear Regulatory Authority, MES/Gosatomnadzor, in the field of nuclear emergency preparedness and response.

In its February 2016 conclusions on Belarus, the Council reaffirmed that good neighbourly relations and regional cooperation were key to enhanced EU-Belarus cooperation, reiterated the importance of ensuring nuclear safety beyond the borders of the EU, and called on Belarus to cooperate with the relevant international authorities.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

EU’s refugee crisis
EU Legislation in Progress
Topical Digests
EPRS Podcasts

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 2,234 other followers

RSS Link to Members’ Research Service

Disclaimer and Copyright statement

The content of all documents (and articles) contained in this blog is the sole responsibility of the author and any opinions expressed therein do not necessarily represent the official position of the European Parliament. It is addressed to the Members and staff of the EP for their parliamentary work. Reproduction and translation for non-commercial purposes are authorised, provided the source is acknowledged and the European Parliament is given prior notice and sent a copy. Copyright © European Union, 2014. All rights reserved

%d bloggers like this: