Members' Research Service By / March 2, 2023

Revision of the EU rules on asset recovery and confiscation [EU Legislation in Progress]

Serious and organised crime remains a major threat to EU security. While precise statistics are lacking – both globally and at EU level – revenues generated by organised crime are substantial.

© bluedesign / Adobe Stock

Written by Beatrix immenkamp (2nd edition, updated on 28.05.2024).

The confiscation of criminals’ illicit profits is considered an effective tool in the fight against organised crime, identified as a major threat to EU security. However, despite the comprehensive set of EU rules on asset freezing and confiscation, there are still obstacles on the path to recovering criminal assets, as shown by the European Commission’s June 2020 evaluation of the 2014 directive on freezing and confiscation of instrumentalities and proceeds of crime and the 2007 Council decision on asset recovery offices (AROs). To address this situation, in May 2022 the Commission adopted a proposal to amend the 2014 directive with a view to strengthening the EU’s asset recovery and confiscation rules and reinforcing the powers of AROs.

In the European Parliament, the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs adopted its report on 23 May 2023. On 12 December 2023, the co-legislators reached a provisional agreement on the text in interinstitutional negotiations. On 13 March 2024, the European Parliament adopted its position at first reading by 598 votes to 19, with 7 abstentions. The Council adopted the directive on 12 April 2024, and on 2 May 2024 the final act was published in the Official Journal. Member States must transpose the directive by 23 November 2026.

Versions

Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on asset recovery and confiscation
Committee responsible:Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (LIBE)COM(2022) 245 final
25.5.2022
Rapporteur:Loránt Vincze (EPP, Romania)2022/0167(COD)
Shadow rapporteurs:Thijs Reuten (S&D, Netherlands)
Malik Azmani (Renew, Netherlands)
Sergey Lagodinsky (Greens/EFA, Germany)
Nicolaus Fest (Identity and Democracy Group, Germany)
Assita Kanko (ECR, Belgium)
José Gusmão (GUE/NGL, Portugal)
Ordinary legislative
procedure (COD)
(Parliament and Council
on equal footing
– formerly ‘co-decision’)
Procedure completed.
Directive (EU) 2024/1260
OJ L, 2024/1260, 2.5.2024
Stage: procedure completed

Related Articles

Be the first to write a comment.

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Epthinktank

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

EPRS Logo
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.