Airport slots are permits allocated to airlines to use airport facilities for takeoff and landing on a specific day and at a specific time. To address growing airport congestion in the European Union, the Commission is proposing to allow market-based mechanisms in slot trading and allocation, increased transparency in slot transactions, and greater independence for slot coordinators.
Growing air traffic over the past decade (see Fig. 1) has increased pressure on the capacity available at major EU airports.
The creation of the single market for aviation in the 1990s brought EU-wide regulation for airport slots (a system in which a coordinator – usually an independent not-for-profit company – allows airlines to use an airport’s facilities for landing or take-off on specific days and times). A 1993 Regulation set common rules for the allocation of slots, based on principles of neutrality, transparency and non-discrimination. Under these rules, airlines which have used their slots at least 80% of the time during the summer/winter scheduling period are entitled to the same slots in the following year’s equivalent scheduling period (so-called “grandfather rights”). Slots which are not used sufficiently, go to a slot pool to be reallocated (the so-called “use it or lose it” rule). The Regulation also allows airlines to transfer or exchange slots, but not to buy or sell them (so called “secondary trading”) even though this practice does occur (mainly at UK airports).
Why a new Commission proposal
Analysis shows that the current system prevents optimal use of scarce airport capacity for a number of reasons, including: misuse and late return of unneeded slots, barriers for new entrants and their expansion, absence of an EU-wide framework for secondary trading, and insufficient independence of slot coordinators.
The Commission claims that instead of expanding infrastructure – which could harm the environment – enhanced slot allocation schemes would be effective for managing scarce capacity. Consequently, following a public consultation and stakeholders’ hearing, the Commission proposed a new regulation in 2011, encouraging competition with market-based mechanisms. The proposal introduces a formal framework for secondary trading (explicitly allowing buying and selling of slots) and broadens the definition of new entrants, so that more can challenge ‘dominant’ airlines (usually national carriers). The Commission also proposes a strengthened slot allocation process, and increased independence of coordinators through clear rules on their financing.
Analysis from the Commission concludes that, up to 2025, the changes could create 62 000 jobs, generate economic benefits of around €5 billion for the EU, and allow the system to handle 24 million more passengers per year.
Transport Committee views
MEPs supported buying and selling of slots. However, they underlined that secondary trading should not put connections with major regional airports at risk – echoing a similar concern from the Council – and proposed that part of the proceeds of slot transactions go to improving airport infrastructure and services for passengers. In addition, MEPs introduced the idea of financial sanctions rather than general fees, as an incentive for airlines to return unneeded slots to the pool without delay. They also requested slot coordinators submit a declaration of financial interests.
The Committee approved the report with 39 votes in favour and 5 against.
Strictly Necessary Cookies
Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.
If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.
The present website is hosted by WordPress.com, a service by Automattic. Automattic is a global company with thousands of servers located in several separate data centres around the world. While Automattic takes care of the security of the platform, we, the European Parliamentary Research Service, own the content of the blog. For more detailed information about the compliance of Automattic products and services with the EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), please see their dedicated page.
We do not collect any personal data that could identify an individual user. The users that are registered in WordPress.com should consult wordpress.com terms of service. We do collect anonymised aggregate data for statistical purposes. The data collected for this purposes include: number of visits/visitors per page, the country of the user, and aggregate numbers of incoming and outgoing clicks.
We determine unique page counts by using a “hashed” version of the visitor’s IP address. The visitor’s full IP address is deleted from our logs after a little over a month. That timeframe is how long the data is needed in order to allow us to calculate your stats on a monthly basis and no longer.
We collect your email address only if you proactively requested to be notified about the updates on the blog. You can always contact us to remove your email address from our records or unsubscribe from the notification service.
We can also see your name and email address if you made a comment to one of our posts. We do not make the email address visible on the comment. Nevertheless, on request, we can delete your comments.
We collect cookies only to facilitate your browsing experience, such as enabling you to share our posts via social media or comment on the post. The majority of cookies will be used only if you are a registered WordPress.com user. In this case, you are bound to WordPress.com terms of service.
Some pages embed content from third parties. In this case, you will need to actively consent to their terms in order to see the content.