you're reading...
Institutional and Legal Affairs, PUBLICATIONS, Structural and Cohesion Policies

Anti-corruption measures in EU sports policy

Written by Vivienne Halleux

Corruption and good governance in sport have been a constant concern for the EU since the very beginning of its sport policy. Preserving the integrity of sport has been given top priority in the two EU Work Plans for Sport adopted by the Council in recent years.

General framework

Anti-corruption measures in EU sports policy

© RVNW / Fotolia

EU competence in the field of sport is a supporting one (Article 6, Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – TFEU), meaning that the Union can carry out actions to support, coordinate or supplement measures taken by its Member States. In particular, it adds value by helping address transnational challenges where concerted efforts and a coordinated approach are needed. The objectives of EU sports policy are defined in Article 165 TFEU as being the promotion of fairness and openness in sporting competitions and cooperation between bodies responsible for sports, and the protection of the physical and moral integrity of sportsmen and -women. Article 165 only allows for incentive measures and recommendations, excluding any harmonisation of the laws and regulations of Member States. The EU approach to corruption and good governance in sport, as indicated by key policy documents such as the Commission’s White Paper on Sport (2007) and Communication on Developing the European dimension in sport (2011), as well as the 2011-14 and 2014-17 Work Plans for Sport, rests mainly on structured dialogue and cooperation with relevant competent organisations, sports movement and bodies, and support for projects and networks.

Policy tools

Structured dialogue with sports movements takes concrete form in the annual ‘EU Sport Forum’, where key sport-related issues are discussed. Its 2012 meeting led to the adoption of the Nicosia Declaration on match-fixing. The EU Expert Group on Good Governance, created by the Council in adopting the first EU Work Plan for Sport, also offers a platform for dialogue. It gathers experts from national governments as well as European and international sporting bodies (observer status is granted to sports stakeholders upon request), is supported and attended by the Commission and reports to the Council. Achievements so far include recommendations on principles of good governance in sport, on the EU’s role in combating match-fixing and on supervision of sports agents and transfers of players. Within the framework of the 2014-17 Work Plan, the group is expected to work on guiding principles relating, inter alia, to democracy, in particular in the context of the procedure for awarding major sport events to hosts. Cooperation with competent international organisations is covered in Article 165 TFEU. One such example is the Commission’s participation, on behalf of the EU, in the negotiations for the Council of Europe’s Convention on the manipulation of sports competitions, a legally binding instrument open to signature by the EU. Finally, incentive measures include financial support under the sports ‘Preparatory Actions’ for transnational projects submitted by public bodies or civil society organisations, notably in the area of good governance. In 2014-20, these actions are covered by the sport chapter of the Erasmus+ programme, allocating funds for collaborative partnerships promoting integrity in sport and non-profit-making European sports events.

European Parliament

Parliament has participated actively in the work on corruption and good governance in sport. Besides dedicated committee hearings on the issue, it has adopted a written declaration on combating corruption in European Sport (2011); a resolution on the European dimension in sport (2012) calling for a ‘zero tolerance’ policy on corruption; and a resolution on match-fixing and corruption in sport (2013) asking Member States to introduce common sanctions for match-fixing. In reaction to recent corruption allegations against the international football federation, FIFA, the EP adopted a resolution on 11 June 2015, urging in-depth structural reforms within the organisation.

Read this At a glance note on Anti-corruption measures in EU sports policy in PDF

Discussion

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Pingback: The Parliament’s Plenary Sessions: at a glance | European Parliamentary Research Service - July 20, 2015

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Download the EPRS App

EPRS App on Google Play
EPRS App on App Store
What Europe Does For You
EU Legislation in Progress
Topical Digests
EPRS Podcasts

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 3,391 other followers

RSS Link to Members’ Research Service

Disclaimer and Copyright statement

The content of all documents (and articles) contained in this blog is the sole responsibility of the author and any opinions expressed therein do not necessarily represent the official position of the European Parliament. It is addressed to the Members and staff of the EP for their parliamentary work. Reproduction and translation for non-commercial purposes are authorised, provided the source is acknowledged and the European Parliament is given prior notice and sent a copy.

For a comprehensive description of our cookie and data protection policies, please visit Terms and Conditions page.

Copyright © European Union, 2014-2019. All rights reserved.

%d bloggers like this: