The workshop was chaired by Algirdas Saudargas (EPP, Lithuania), and moderated by Maite Melero, Senior Researcher and Associate Professor at GLiCOM, the Computational Linguistics Research Group at the Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona.
‘The EU should become a world leader in the field of language technologies’ is how Georg Rehm, Senior Researcher at the German Research Centre for Artificial Intelligence and General Secretary, Network of Excellence META-NET, described the implications of the need to overcome language barriers in the EU and tackle competition with US corporations such as Google and Microsoft. Other expert speakers who contributed to the workshop included Andrejs Vasiljevs, CEO, Tilde; Sabine Kirchmeier, Vice-President of the executive committee, European Federation of National Institutions of Languages; and István Horváth, President of the Romanian Institute for Researching the Problems of National Minorities.
The presentations were followed by a panel discussion with the speakers, as well as with MEPs Jill Evans (Greens/EFA, United Kingdom), Ádám Kósa (EPP, Hungary) and Csaba Sógor (EPP, Romania), and Marco Marsella from the European Commission, on the impact of language technologies in the digital age. Jill Evans explained her vision regarding minority languages, while Ádám Kósa explained that sign languages should be included in the multilingualism policies of the EU, and should be made available where they are needed. In his view, new language technologies can substantially help users of sign languages and there are some good examples in the field. Sign languages should have the same rights as other languages. Csaba Sógor noted that minority language rights should be promoted, and not hindered (as it is the case in some countries which have legislation against the use of minority languages), because guaranteeing minority rights can contribute to economic growth. Marco Marsella pointed out that the European Commission is investing millions of euros in language technology research, and is also trying to draw upon data from national institutions, where the data gap is challenging: data should be openly available. Research needs to reach the operators, who will transform it into applications.
Trafodaeth diddorol am gydraddoldeb ieithoedd yn yr oes digidol. Prosiect Iaith Dynol. Human Language Project @Plaid_Cymru#Languagetech
In conclusion, it was widely recognised that multilingualism is, simultaneously a challenge and an opportunity for Europe in the digital age. The speakers agreed on the socio-economic consequences of language barriers in creating an integrated Europe, particularly for the digital single market. Most speakers pointed to the need to increase funding for basic research in Europe and to improve the way innovations are taken to the market. They also agreed on how difficult it is to compete with big global champions in this area. There was a consensus that small country and minority languages particularly benefit from human language technologies (HLT). However, HLT are mainly developed for ‘big’ languages, thus contributing to the digital extinction of many smaller European languages.
‘Today, the “European Human Language Programme” is born’, announced Hans Uszkoreit, Scientific Director, German Research Centre for Artificial Intelligence and Network of Excellence META-NET, and this ‘proposal’ was echoed by experts and participants. Such a programme, if launched, could act as an umbrella for the various European and national initiatives, to increase efficiency, promote the sharing of resources and knowledge, and to increase the available funding with a long-term vision, while national and regional initiatives should take care of developing enough specific resources for their languages.
Paul Rübig (EPP, Austria), STOA Chair, concluded that language technologies can play a key role in Europe, because languages are a very important resource and, as such, occupy a prominent place among STOA’s research priorities.
The study was presented to Members of Parliament’s Industry, Research and Energy and Culture & Education Committees on 25 January 2017, receiving very positive feedback. To keep up to date with this project and other STOA activities, follow our website, the EPRS blog, Twitter and Think Tank pages.
The Scientific Foresight Unit (STOA) carries out interdisciplinary research and provides strategic advice in the field of science and technology options assessment and scientific foresight. It undertakes in-depth studies and organises workshops on developments in these fields, and it hosts the European Science-Media Hub (ESMH), a platform to promote networking, training and knowledge sharing between the EP, the scientific community and the media. All this work is carried out under the guidance of the Panel for the Future of Science and Technology (STOA), composed of 27 MEPs nominated by 11 EP Committees. The STOA Panel forms an integral part of the structure of the EP.
European Parliament Plenary Session – December 2023
The G20 in a time of geopolitical upheaval
COP28 climate change conference in Dubai
Generative AI: opportunities, risks and challenges
EU-Ukraine 2035 – Foresight beyond the war
European Parliament Plenary Session – November II 2023
What is the EU doing to protect human rights?
How do we want to produce and consume food in a more sustainable way?
European Parliament Plenary Session – November I 2023
World Cities Day 2023
Death penalty – answering citizens’ concerns
Appointment of Wopke Hoekstra as new climate commissioner – answering citizens’ concerns
Strictly Necessary Cookies
Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.
If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.
The present website is hosted by WordPress.com, a service by Automattic. Automattic is a global company with thousands of servers located in several separate data centres around the world. While Automattic takes care of the security of the platform, we, the European Parliamentary Research Service, own the content of the blog. For more detailed information about the compliance of Automattic products and services with the EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), please see their dedicated page.
We do not collect any personal data that could identify an individual user. The users that are registered in WordPress.com should consult wordpress.com terms of service. We do collect anonymised aggregate data for statistical purposes. The data collected for this purposes include: number of visits/visitors per page, the country of the user, and aggregate numbers of incoming and outgoing clicks.
We determine unique page counts by using a “hashed” version of the visitor’s IP address. The visitor’s full IP address is deleted from our logs after a little over a month. That timeframe is how long the data is needed in order to allow us to calculate your stats on a monthly basis and no longer.
We collect your email address only if you proactively requested to be notified about the updates on the blog. You can always contact us to remove your email address from our records or unsubscribe from the notification service.
We can also see your name and email address if you made a comment to one of our posts. We do not make the email address visible on the comment. Nevertheless, on request, we can delete your comments.
We collect cookies only to facilitate your browsing experience, such as enabling you to share our posts via social media or comment on the post. The majority of cookies will be used only if you are a registered WordPress.com user. In this case, you are bound to WordPress.com terms of service.
Some pages embed content from third parties. In this case, you will need to actively consent to their terms in order to see the content.