EU policies
Here you’ll find graphs, charts, tables and maps with statistics in the area of freedom, security and justice.
To see graphics for other policy areas, go to the Graphics Warehouse.
Graphics on Migration and refugees
- Figure 1 – Migration routes and illegal crossings to the EU
- International migrant stock (millions)
- Return decisions and effective returns
- Irregular border crossings and asylum applications (in millions)
- Hotspots in Greece and in Italy
- Asylum applicants in the EU-27
- Missing migrants along the Mediterranean migratory routes
- © European Union 2020, EPRS
- First permits issued for family reunification to a beneficiary of protection status 2016-2018
- First-instance decisions 2015-2018, by outcome
- Non-EU population 25-54 years by education level (2018)
- Age distribution by citizenship – EU and non-EU (Percentage of population, 2018)
- Labour force – non-EU population (% of non-EU population 15-64 years, 4th quarter 2018)
- Non-EU population in the Member States (Percentage share and in million persons, 2018)
- First instance decisions on asylum (2018)
- Top 20 countries of origin (in 1 000 applicants, 2018)
- Asylum applicants in the EU (in 1 000 applicants, 2018)
- Asylum applicants in the EU (per million inhabitants, 2018)
- Migrants in the European Union* (in millions)
- First residence permits per inhabitant in 2016
- First residence permits by reason
- First residence permits for occupational reasons in 2017
- EU blue cards granted in 2017
- EU blue card holders’ main countries of origin, 2017 (thousands)
- Residence permits granted in the EU for family reasons
- Employment rates in 2017, by citizenship group, education and gender
- SIS alerts (in millions)
- Detections of illegal crossings of EU external borders
- Detections of illegal border crossings in the EU and migratory routes
- Alerts and searches in SIS II
- First-time asylum applications and irregular border crossings
- Number of resettled refugees by resettlement country in 2017
- Top 25 countries in the world ranked by the number of refugees and people in a refugee-like situation, excluding asylum-seekers, living in them in mid-2017
- First instance decisions on asylum in the EU-28
- Asylum applicants in the EU-28
- Missing migrants along the Mediterranean migratory routes
- Detections of illegal border crossing in the EU
- Areas targeted by main migration funding programmes
- Top 20 states of non-EU citizens returned to their country of origin, 2015-2016
- Figure 2 – Hits related to persons found illegally staying in a Member State who had previously lodged an application in another Member State
- Figure 1 – Hits related to applicants for international protection who have previously lodged an application in another Member State
- Comparison of EU Blue Cards (BC) and first permits
- Eurojust’s cases
- New data subjects related to illegal stay and corresponding hits in Eurodac
- VIS searches for law enforcement purposes
- International tourist arrivals in the EU, including projections
- Requests and notifications sent through ECRIS (thousands)
- Member states implementing the Prüm Decisions on key types of data
- Foreign terrorist fighters in the EIS
- Data subjects in the EIS (in millions)
- New data subjects related to asylum claims and corresponding hits in Eurodac
- Data subjects in Eurodac (in millions)
- VIS searches for asylum purposes and for visa verification in the territory
- Applications for Schengen visa (in millions)
- Searches in the SIS (in billions)
- Alerts on persons in the SIS (in millions)
- Illegal border crossings and first time asylum applications (in millions)
- Illegally staying third-country nationals, return decisions and effective returns
- SIS alerts on persons
- Regional statistics (absolute numbers) for migrant children, 2015
- Children on the Move Globally in 2015 (absolute numbers)
- Asylum applications in the 28 EU Member States
- EASO budget (€ million)
- The Western Balkan route
- Authorities involved in the asylum procedure
- Foreign fighters (FF) and returnees by Member State, 2015
- Top three main countries of origin for asylum applications in the EU 2011-2014
- Migration routes towards Europe, main countries of origin and detention centres
- The EU contribution to building refugee and host community resilience (29 January 2016)
- The EU contribution to building refugee and host community resilience (14 January 2016)
- Humanitarian response plans 2016 (US$bn)
- Humanitarian response (2000-2016)
Graphics on Institutional affairs
- Figure 1 – The pros and cons of QMV in foreign and security policy
- Total tweets per EU leader January 2019 to June 2020
- Figure 2 – Total EU-related tweets by EU Heads of State or Government, January 2019 to June 2020
- Figure 3 – EU tweets as a percentage of EU leaders’ total tweets
- Figure 4 – Total number of EU issues addressed per EU Head of State or Government
- Figure 5 – Frequency and weight of tweets on EU issues
- Figure 6 – EU leaders’ Twitter activity on different clusters and individual EU issues
- Figure 7 – Tweets concerning EU external relations per EU leader and sub-issue
- Figure 8 – Number of tweets by EU Heads of State or Government by meeting format
- Figure 9 – Twitter communication by EU leaders on meetings with other EU leaders
- Figure 9 – Twitter communication by EU leaders on meetings with other EU leaders
- Figure 11 – Actual vs potential bilateral meetings between EU leaders as reported on Twitter
- Figure 13 – Bilateral meetings between EU leaders who were in office during the full 18-month period
- Figure 12 – Extrapolated sum of bilateral meetings between EU leaders, as reported on Twitter
- Figure 14 – Extrapolated data on EU leaders’ meetings and their reporting on them via Twitter
- Figure 15 – Key Franco-German interactions as reported on Twitter by Emmanuel Macron and Angela Merkel
- Figure 16 – Average EU leaders’ total and EU tweets January 2019-June 2020
- Figure 17 – Average EU leaders’ tweets on external relations, January 2019-June 2020
- Figure 18 – Average number of EU leaders’ tweets on the MFF, January 2019-June 2020
- Figure 19 – Average number of EU leaders’ tweets on Brexit and Covid 19, January 2019-June 2020
- Figure 20 – EU leaders’ tweets on EU representatives and institutions, January 2019-June 2020
- Figure 21 – Average tweets on institutional and cross-cutting issues, January 2019-June 2020
- Figure 22 – Average number of tweets by EU leaders who held the Council presidency, January 2019 June 2020
- Overview of topics addressed by each head of state or government, January 2019
- Participants in Future of Europe debates in the European Parliament, January 2019
- Timeline and key milestones of European Council involvement
- Participants in Future of Europe debates in the European Parliament, October 2018
- Turnout in European Parliament elections, 1979-2014
- Overview of topics addressed by each Head of State or Government
- Reservations in CETA by annexe and country
- Countries that use internet voting
- UK imports from extra-EU partners for selected agricultural sectors and share of UK imports in total EU imports from non-EU countries for those agricultural sectors (2017)
- UK trade with other EU Member States (in share of total trade with the EU, 2017)
- Tariff rate quote (TRQ) per EU-27 share of in quota usage
- Countries that use electronic voting
- UK trade with EU-28 and with the rest of the world (2016)
- Minimum age of candidates
- steps to prepare for the special European Council (Article 50) meeting on 25 November
- Electoral Threshold
- Location of Commission staff
- Gender distribution and size of each Directorate-General
- Gender distribution of staff by age group
- Commissioners, Directorates-General and staff
- Nationality of Commission staff
- Number of MEPs and voting system
- Size of political groups in the EP by Member State (as of 8 July 2015)
- Commissioners’ relationships with EP Committees
- political affiliation of current EU Heads of State or Government
- Size of political groups in the EP by Member State (as of 11 November 2015)
- Repartition of UK total trade (2017)
- Size of political groups in the EP by Member State (as of 10 June 2015)
- Number and average length of co-decision procedures
- Current membership of the European Council October 2018
- Number of legislative and own-initiative reports
- Age of MEPs by Member State
- Role of the European Council
- Gender and age of members of the European Council
- Historical evolution of the European Council
- Figure 4 – Citizenship tests in EU-28
- Figure 3 – Dual citizenship in naturalisation in EU-28
- Presidents of the European Council
- Figure 6 – Migrant population in EU-28 (millions)
- Figure 1 – Rules of jus soli citizenship in EU-28
- Figure 5 – Major modes of involuntary loss of citizenship in EU-28
- number of legislative resolutions adopted in plenary each year since 2004
- Priority 8: Towards a New Policy on Migration
- Figure 2 – Minimum period of residence required for naturalisation in EU-28 (years)
- Annual cost of the EP per inhabitant
- Parliamentary committees
- Voting from abroad
- EP Bureau
- Expected election day
- Number of legislative and own-initiative reports
- Trends in turnout at national and EP elections
- EP Conference of Presidents
- National parties and political groups in the EP
- Table 2 – Essential elements of EU negotiating position on the financial settlement
- Priority 7: An Area of Justice and Fundamental Rights Based on Mutual Trust
- TTIP reading rooms in EU Member States
- Size of political groups by MS
- EP Size and proportion of political groups
- Strengths of Political groups
- Proportion of men and women in the EP
- Priority 3: A Resilient Energy Union with a Forward-Looking Climate Change Policy
- Timeline of main steps taken in the EU and UK post-referendum, 2016 and early 2017
- Previous rounds of negotiations
- Timeline
- Expectations for more EU involvement – Differences between Member States
- Women MEPs by Member State
- Working with partners and citizens
- Legislation on lobbying
- Data source: The European Parliament (9th edition), Corbett, Jacobs, Neville, 2016.
- Size of political groups in the European Parliament by Member State (as of 03 May 2017)
- Evolution of registrations in the Transparency Register since its launch
- National provisions
- Number of trilogues per year and per committee
- Breakdown of entities registered in the Transparency register
- Gap between expectation and current EU involvement
- Priority 6: A Reasonable and Balanced Free Trade Agreement with the USA
- stage of the co-decision procedure at which the EP and Council reached agreement on individual legislative texts
- The College of Commissioners in a historical perspective
- Negotiations on a withdrawal agreement
- Characteristics of the structures and institutions of science-advice systems
- Stage of the co-decision procedure at which the EP and Council reached agreement
- Priority 4: A Deeper and Fairer Internal Market with a Strengthened Industrial Base
- Priority 10: A Union of Democratic Change
- Total Commission staff
- Table 1 – Summary of benefits rights for EU citizens in a host Member State under the current EU rules
- Table 1 UK participation in certain instruments
- Women in EP and EU national parliaments
- Proportion of Members in each political group
- Article 50 TEU procedure
- Timeline towards the UK’s in-out referendum on EU membership
- Priority 1: A New Boost for Jobs, Growth and Investment
- Register of lobbyists
- The Scientific Advice Mechanism
- Priority 9: A Stronger Global Actor
- Overview of results from studies on TTIP’s economic impact on the EU and the USA
- Strengths of the political groups in each parliamentary term
- Lobbying regulation in the EU Member States
- Step by Step Article 50 of a Member State applicaiton to leave the EU
- Priority 2: A Connected Digital Single Market
- Impact assessment support to Parliament’s committees throughout the legislative cycle
- Size of political group
- Number of trilogues per year and per committee
- Code of conduct for lobbyists
- Petitions to the EP by field
- College of Commissioners
- Commissioners, portfolios and project teams
- TTIP negotiating documents and access
- Priority 5: A Deeper and Fairer Economic and Monetary Union
- College of Commissioners by age and gender (1999-2014)
- Parliamentary committees
- Activity in plenary
- Size of political groups in the EP by Member State (as of 1 March 2016)
- Legislative resolutions adopted in plenary since 2004
- Political make-up of the College of Commissioners
- Number of staff by Directorate-General
- Historical evolution of the number of Commission staff posts
- Proposals and legal acts adopted by the Commission
- Infringement procedures
Graphics on Legal affairs
- Number of contact tracing apps developed/endorsed by EU Member States
- Schengen countries with internal border controls
- EU citizens repatriated under the EU Civil Protection Mechanism, to 30 March 2020
- EU visa applications and granted visas (in millions)
- Summary table trends in crime rates in existing Schengen states before and after 2007
- Summary table trends in crime rates in newly acceding Schengen and Non-Schengen states before and after 2007
- Schengen area
- Key Legal Acts: Area of Freedom, Security and Justice
Graphics on Women’s rights
- Women in EP by political group
- Women in EP and national parliaments
- Female representatives in the EP by Member State
- Women in national parliaments compared with the European Parliament
- Women in parliaments
- Women in external affairs in the European Parliament, (%) beginning of the 2019-2024 term
- Women in foreign and defence ministerial positions in the EU, 2019
- Women in the movies – Women behind the camera
- Women in the movies – Sexualisation of characters
- Women in the movies – Characters
- Women shaping the news and in the news -Public broadcasters
- Women shaping the news and in the news -People in the news
- Women shaping the news and in the news – by topic by media
- Women shaping the news and in the news – Reporters
- Activities conducted on the internet – Creating websites or blogs
- Activities conducted on the internet – Reading online news newspapers or magazines
- Activities conducted on the internet – Purchasing goods and services
- Cyber harassment
- Security concerns
- Women who have never used the internet
- Use of mobile devices to access the internet
- Daily computer usage
- Digital skills (basic or above basic)
- EU gender gap in digital and media sectors
- Employed ICT specialists
- Empowering women in the EU and beyond
- Healthy life expectancy
- Fertility rate
- Female Members of the European Parliament
- Female infant mortality
- Female ministers
- Women in the military
- Literacy
Graphics on Public expectations and EU policies
- National overnments should strengthen school education about rights and responsibilities as EU citizens (%)
- In your opinion, which of the following topics should be a priority for the EU? (%)
- Percentage of young people, who chose education and skills as a top priority for the EU
- Expectations for more EU action than at present: percentage point difference between 2016 and 2018
- Percentage of respondents who would like the EU to intervene more than it does at present
- Perception of EU action as adequate at present: percentage point difference between 2016 and 2018
- Perception of EU action as adequate at present: percentage points difference between 2016 and 2018
- Expectations for more EU action than at present: percentage points difference between 2016 and 2018
- Percentage of respondents who would like the EU to intervene more than at present
- Market share of European films in terms of admissions % in 2016
- Cinema admissions in millions
- Unesco World Cultural Heritage Sites
- Investment in cultural diplomacy, 2014, in €million
- Multiannual Financial Framework 2014-2020
- percentage of respondents who would like the eu to intervene more than at present
- Creative Europe budget in € million
- Percentage of respondents who would like the EU to intervene more than at present
- Expectations for more EU action than at present: percentage points difference between 2016 and 2018
- Perception of EU action as adequate at present: percentage points difference between 2016 and 2018
- Human rights as the most important personal value, per Member State, in %
- expectations for more eu action than at present – percentage points difference between 2016 and 2018
- gender gap in employment
- Human rights as a value that best represents the European Union, per Member State, in %
- gender gap in education
- perception of eu action as adequate at present – percentage points difference between 2016 and 2018
- EU development aid for conflict, peace and security by sectors (2014-2016)
- Expectations for more EU action than at present: percentage points difference between 2016 and 2018
- Share of EU official development aid (ODA) for peace and governance sectors (2014-2016)
- Perception of EU action as adequate at present: percentage points difference between 2016 and 2018
- Percentage of respondents who would like the EU to intervene more than at present
- EU development aid for government and civil society by sectors (2014-2016)
- Percentage of respondents who would like the EU to intervene more than at present
- CSDP missions/operations
- Public expectations and EU commitment on equal treatment of men and women
- Expectations for more EU action than at present: percentage points difference between 2016 and 201
- Public expectations and EU commitment on the issue of migration
- Public expectations and EU commitment on industrial policy
- Public expectations and EU commitment on energy supply and energy security
- Public expectations and EU commitment on the fight against unemployment
- Perception of EU action as adequate at present: percentage points difference between 2016 and 2018
- Expectations for more EU involvement – Differences between Member States
- Gap between expectation and current EU involvement
- Public expectations and EU commitment on agriculture
- Public expectations and EU commitment on protection of external borders
- Public expectations and EU commitment on environmental protection
- Public expectations and EU commitment on the fight against tax fraud
- Public expectations and EU commitment on economic policy
- Public expectations and EU commitment on health and social security
- Public expectations and EU commitment on the fight against terrorism
- Public expectations and EU commitment regarding the promotion of democracy and peace in the world
- Public expectations and EU commitment regarding security and defence
- Public expectations and EU commitment on foreign policy
- Market share of European films in terms of admissions % in 2016
- Cinema admissions in millions
- Unesco World Cultural Heritage Sites
- Investment in cultural diplomacy, 2014, in €million
- Multiannual Financial Framework 2014-2020
- percentage of respondents who would like the eu to intervene more than at present
- Creative Europe budget in € million
- Percentage of respondents who would like the EU to intervene more than at present
- Expectations for more EU action than at present: percentage points difference between 2016 and 2018
- Perception of EU action as adequate at present: percentage points difference between 2016 and 2018
- Human rights as the most important personal value, per Member State, in %
- expectations for more eu action than at present – percentage points difference between 2016 and 2018
- gender gap in employment
- Human rights as a value that best represents the European Union, per Member State, in %
- gender gap in education
- perception of eu action as adequate at present – percentage points difference between 2016 and 2018
- EU development aid for conflict, peace and security by sectors (2014-2016)
- Expectations for more EU action than at present: percentage points difference between 2016 and 2018
- Share of EU official development aid (ODA) for peace and governance sectors (2014-2016)
- Perception of EU action as adequate at present: percentage points difference between 2016 and 2018
- Percentage of respondents who would like the EU to intervene more than at present
- EU development aid for government and civil society by sectors (2014-2016)
- Percentage of respondents who would like the EU to intervene more than at present
- CSDP missions/operations
- Public expectations and EU commitment on equal treatment of men and women
- Expectations for more EU action than at present: percentage points difference between 2016 and 201
- Public expectations and EU commitment on the issue of migration
- Public expectations and EU commitment on industrial policy
- Public expectations and EU commitment on energy supply and energy security
- Public expectations and EU commitment on the fight against unemployment
- Perception of EU action as adequate at present: percentage points difference between 2016 and 2018
- Expectations for more EU involvement – Differences between Member States
- Gap between expectation and current EU involvement
- Public expectations and EU commitment on agriculture
- Public expectations and EU commitment on protection of external borders
- Public expectations and EU commitment on environmental protection
- Public expectations and EU commitment on the fight against tax fraud
- Public expectations and EU commitment on economic policy
- Public expectations and EU commitment on health and social security
- Public expectations and EU commitment on the fight against terrorism
- Public expectations and EU commitment regarding the promotion of democracy and peace in the world
- Public expectations and EU commitment regarding security and defence
- Public expectations and EU commitment on foreign policy
- Market share of European films in terms of admissions % in 2016
- Cinema admissions in millions
- Unesco World Cultural Heritage Sites
- Investment in cultural diplomacy, 2014, in €million
- Multiannual Financial Framework 2014-2020
- percentage of respondents who would like the eu to intervene more than at present
- Creative Europe budget in € million
- Percentage of respondents who would like the EU to intervene more than at present
- Expectations for more EU action than at present: percentage points difference between 2016 and 2018
- Perception of EU action as adequate at present: percentage points difference between 2016 and 2018
- Human rights as the most important personal value, per Member State, in %
- expectations for more eu action than at present – percentage points difference between 2016 and 2018
- gender gap in employment
- Human rights as a value that best represents the European Union, per Member State, in %
- gender gap in education
- perception of eu action as adequate at present – percentage points difference between 2016 and 2018
- EU development aid for conflict, peace and security by sectors (2014-2016)
- Expectations for more EU action than at present: percentage points difference between 2016 and 2018
- Share of EU official development aid (ODA) for peace and governance sectors (2014-2016)
- Perception of EU action as adequate at present: percentage points difference between 2016 and 2018
- Percentage of respondents who would like the EU to intervene more than at present
- EU development aid for government and civil society by sectors (2014-2016)
- Percentage of respondents who would like the EU to intervene more than at present
- CSDP missions/operations
- Public expectations and EU commitment on equal treatment of men and women
- Expectations for more EU action than at present: percentage points difference between 2016 and 201
- Public expectations and EU commitment on the issue of migration
- Public expectations and EU commitment on industrial policy
- Public expectations and EU commitment on energy supply and energy security
- Public expectations and EU commitment on the fight against unemployment
- Perception of EU action as adequate at present: percentage points difference between 2016 and 2018
- Expectations for more EU involvement – Differences between Member States
- Gap between expectation and current EU involvement
- Public expectations and EU commitment on agriculture
- Public expectations and EU commitment on protection of external borders
- Public expectations and EU commitment on environmental protection
- Public expectations and EU commitment on the fight against tax fraud
- Public expectations and EU commitment on economic policy
- Public expectations and EU commitment on health and social security
- Public expectations and EU commitment on the fight against terrorism
- Public expectations and EU commitment regarding the promotion of democracy and peace in the world
- Public expectations and EU commitment regarding security and defence
- Public expectations and EU commitment on foreign policy
- Perception of EU action as adequate at present: percentage points difference between 2016 and 2018
- Expectations for more EU action than at present: percentage points difference between 2016 and 2018
- Percentage of respondents who would like the EU to intervene more than at present
- Market share of European films in terms of admissions % in 2016
- Cinema admissions in millions
- Unesco World Cultural Heritage Sites
- Investment in cultural diplomacy, 2014, in €million
- Multiannual Financial Framework 2014-2020
- percentage of respondents who would like the eu to intervene more than at present
- Creative Europe budget in € million
- Percentage of respondents who would like the EU to intervene more than at present
- Expectations for more EU action than at present: percentage points difference between 2016 and 2018
- Perception of EU action as adequate at present: percentage points difference between 2016 and 2018
- Human rights as the most important personal value, per Member State, in %
- expectations for more eu action than at present – percentage points difference between 2016 and 2018
- gender gap in employment
- Human rights as a value that best represents the European Union, per Member State, in %
- gender gap in education
- perception of eu action as adequate at present – percentage points difference between 2016 and 2018
- EU development aid for conflict, peace and security by sectors (2014-2016)
- Expectations for more EU action than at present: percentage points difference between 2016 and 2018
- Share of EU official development aid (ODA) for peace and governance sectors (2014-2016)
- Perception of EU action as adequate at present: percentage points difference between 2016 and 2018
- Percentage of respondents who would like the EU to intervene more than at present
- EU development aid for government and civil society by sectors (2014-2016)
- Percentage of respondents who would like the EU to intervene more than at present
- CSDP missions/operations
- Public expectations and EU commitment on equal treatment of men and women
- Expectations for more EU action than at present: percentage points difference between 2016 and 201
- Public expectations and EU commitment on the issue of migration
- Public expectations and EU commitment on industrial policy
- Public expectations and EU commitment on energy supply and energy security
- Public expectations and EU commitment on the fight against unemployment
- Perception of EU action as adequate at present: percentage points difference between 2016 and 2018
- Expectations for more EU involvement – Differences between Member States
- Gap between expectation and current EU involvement
- Public expectations and EU commitment on agriculture
- Public expectations and EU commitment on protection of external borders
- Public expectations and EU commitment on environmental protection
- Public expectations and EU commitment on the fight against tax fraud
- Public expectations and EU commitment on economic policy
- Public expectations and EU commitment on health and social security
- Public expectations and EU commitment on the fight against terrorism
- Public expectations and EU commitment regarding the promotion of democracy and peace in the world
- Public expectations and EU commitment regarding security and defence
- Public expectations and EU commitment on foreign policy
- Chart 2: European Council meetings in 2020
- Figure 1 – Key topics in the European Council on the coronavirus pandemic
- Focus on migration as part of the European Council conclusions
- Attention paid to Protecting citizens as part of the European Council conclusions 2014-2019
- References to different topics related to EU values and democracy raised by EU Heads of State or Government during their Future of Europe debates in the EP 2018-2019
- European Council role in the EU policy cycle
- Monitoring by the European Council of the Syrian crisis
- Interaction between CARD, PESCO and the EDF
- The Commission’s rule of law framework
- Article 7(1) TEU mechanism (preventive arm)
- Article 7(2) and (3) TEU mechanism (sanctions arm)
- EU pact on democracy, the rule of law and fundamental rights (DRF)
- EU mechanisms to monitor, prevent and enforce EU values
- Appointment of judges-members of councils for the judiciary: involvement of the judiciary
- MEPs by political group
- New and re-elected MEPs – Age of MEPs – Gender of MEPs
- 27 new MEPs from February 2020
- Share of new MEPs by Member State – by political group
- Age of MEPs by Member State
- Female MEPs in the European Parliament
- – Attention paid to Protecting citizens as part of the European Council conclusions 2014-2019
- Focus on migration as part of the European Council conclusions
- References to different topics related to EU values and democracy raised by EU Heads of State or Government during their Future of Europe debates in the EP 2018-2019
- Monitoring by the European Council of the Syrian crisis
- Interaction between CARD, PESCO and the EDF
- Female MEPs in the European Parliament
- Age of MEPs by Member State
- Share of new MEPs by Member State – Share of new MEPs by political group
- 27 new MEPs from February 2020
- New and re-elected MEPs – Gender of MEPs
- MEPs by political group
- Size of political groups in the EP, 13 February 2020
- Number of seats in the European Parliament
- Size of political groups before and after brexit
- Seats vacant redistributed after brexit
- national parties obtaining redistibuted seats after brexit
- 2018 budget
- member states representatives 2018
- gender distribution of representatives by member state 2018
- gender distribution of representatives by Council configuration 2018
- Attendance at Council meetings
- Elections from 2020 onwards
- voting weights in Council
- voting system in Council
- Legal acts adopted by the Council
- Historical overview of Council presidencies
- Council meetings
- Council configurations
- The rotating presidency of the Council
- Size of political groups in the EP by Member State (as of 1 October 2019)
- New and re-elected MEPs in 2019
- Age of MEP’s by MS
- Strengths of the political groups in each parliamentary term
- National parties and political groups in the EP
- Proportion of men and women in the EP
- Women in the EP and EU national parliaments
- Women MEPs by Member State
- Voting system and number of MEPs
- Electoral threshold
- Turnout at EP elections
- Turnout in Member States at EP elections since 1979
- Activity in EP plenary sessions in the seventh term (July 2009 – June 2014)
- Working with citizens and partners
- European Parliament legislative activity, 2004-19
- Codecision
- Number and average length of co-decision procedures
- Number of trilogues per year and per committee
- Number of legislative and own-initiative reports
- The bureau
- Conference of presidents
- Committees
- EP Size and proportion of political groups
- Overview of high-level office-holders since the 2009 EP elections
- Key developments in the debate on the Future of Europe (April 2018 – June 2019)
- Policy priorities of the Bratislava, Rome and Sibiu Declarations
- Selected changes in the 2019-24 Strategic Agenda compared to earlier drafts
- Differences on horizontal issues between the old and the new Strategic Agendas
- Trends in turnout at EP elections
- Turnout at EP elections 2019-2024
- MEPs
- New-Age-female
- New MEPs
- MEPs Age
- MEPs female
- Treaty-based roles of the European Council and the European Parliament for high-level appointments
- European Parliament Presidents
- Participants in Future of Europe debates in the European Parliament (2018-2019)
- Member States whose leaders have participated in Future of Europe debates in the European Parliament (2018-2019)
- Overview of topics addressed by each Head of State or Government
- Main challenges mentioned by speakers
- Number of topics per speaker
- Amount of speaking time spent on various issues
- Frequency of mention of topics
- Time devoted to each topic
- Frequency and weight of topics mentioned
- Press Freedom Index (2018 index)
- Corruption Perceptions Index (2018 index)
- Satisfaction of Europeans with the way democracy works in the EU
- Do Europeans feel themselves citizens of the EU?
- Women MEPs by Member State (as of 31 March 2019)
- Turnout at EP elections (2014)
- Women in EP and national parliaments
- Trends in turnout at national and EP elections
- Figure 2 –Topics planned and actually discussed at Leaders’ meetings and at European Council meetings
- Figure 3 – Questions in Leaders’ Agenda notes clustered by topic and by type
- Figure 4 – Comparison between Leaders’ notes and European Council conclusions
- Figure 5 – Political concerns of EU citizens
- Figure 1 – Leaders’ Agenda decision-making process
- Participants in Future of Europe debates in the European Parliament
- Expected election day
- Electoral Threshold
- Minimum age of candidates
- Number of MEPs and voting system
- Voting from abroad
- Brexit timeline
- EP Size and proportion of political groups
- Size of political groups in the EP by Member State (as of 29 March 2019)
- New and re-elected MEPs
- Age of MEP’s by MS
- Strengths of Political groups
- National parties and political groups in the EP
- Proportion of men and women in the EP
- Women in EP and EU national parliaments
- Women MEPs by Member State
- Voting system and number of MEPs
- Electoral threshold
- Annual cost of the EP per inhabitant
- Turnout in Member States at EP elections since 1979
- Trends in turnout at national and EP elections
- Activity in EP plenary sessions
- Working with partners and citizens
- European Parliament legislative activity, 2004-2018 – Legislative activities
- European Parliament legislative activity, 2004-2018 – Codecision
- Number and average length of co-decision procedures
- Number of trilogues per year and per committee
- Number of legislative and own-initiative reports
- EP Bureau
- EP Conference of Presidents
- Parliamentary committees
- Timeline and key milestones of European Council involvement
- Turnout in European Parliament elections, 1979-2014
- Reservations in CETA by annexe and country
- Countries that use internet voting
- UK imports from extra-EU partners for selected agricultural sectors and share of UK imports in total EU imports from non-EU countries for those agricultural sectors (2017)
- UK trade with other EU Member States (in share of total trade with the EU, 2017)
- Tariff rate quote (TRQ) per EU-27 share of in quota usage
- Countries that use electronic voting
- UK trade with EU-28 and with the rest of the world (2016)
- Minimum age of candidates
- steps to prepare for the special European Council (Article 50) meeting on 25 November
- Location of Commission staff
- Gender distribution and size of each Directorate-General
- Gender distribution of staff by age group
- Commissioners, Directorates-General and staff
- Nationality of Commission staff
- Number of MEPs and voting system
- Size of political groups in the EP by Member State (as of 8 July 2015)
- Commissioners’ relationships with EP Committees
- political affiliation of current EU Heads of State or Government
- Size of political groups in the EP by Member State (as of 11 November 2015)
- Repartition of UK total trade (2017)
- Size of political groups in the EP by Member State (as of 10 June 2015)
- Number and average length of co-decision procedures
- Current membership of the European Council October 2018
- Number of legislative and own-initiative reports
- Age of MEPs by Member State
- Role of the European Council
- Gender and age of members of the European Council
- Historical evolution of the European Council
- Figure 4 – Citizenship tests in EU-28
- Figure 3 – Dual citizenship in naturalisation in EU-28
- Presidents of the European Council
- Figure 6 – Migrant population in EU-28 (millions)
- Figure 1 – Rules of jus soli citizenship in EU-28
- Figure 5 – Major modes of involuntary loss of citizenship in EU-28
- number of legislative resolutions adopted in plenary each year since 2004
- Priority 8: Towards a New Policy on Migration
- Figure 2 – Minimum period of residence required for naturalisation in EU-28 (years)
- Annual cost of the EP per inhabitant
- Parliamentary committees
- Voting from abroad
- EP Bureau
- Expected election day
- Number of legislative and own-initiative reports
- Trends in turnout at national and EP elections
- EP Conference of Presidents
- National parties and political groups in the EP
- Table 2 – Essential elements of EU negotiating position on the financial settlement
- Priority 7: An Area of Justice and Fundamental Rights Based on Mutual Trust
- TTIP reading rooms in EU Member States
- Size of political groups by MS
- EP Size and proportion of political groups
- Strengths of Political groups
- Proportion of men and women in the EP
- Priority 3: A Resilient Energy Union with a Forward-Looking Climate Change Policy
- Timeline of main steps taken in the EU and UK post-referendum, 2016 and early 2017
- Previous rounds of negotiations
- Timeline
- Expectations for more EU involvement – Differences between Member States
- Women MEPs by Member State
- Working with partners and citizens
- Legislation on lobbying
- Data source: The European Parliament (9th edition), Corbett, Jacobs, Neville, 2016.
- Size of political groups in the European Parliament by Member State (as of 03 May 2017)
- Evolution of registrations in the Transparency Register since its launch
- National provisions
- Number of trilogues per year and per committee
- Breakdown of entities registered in the Transparency register
- Gap between expectation and current EU involvement
- Priority 6: A Reasonable and Balanced Free Trade Agreement with the USA
- stage of the co-decision procedure at which the EP and Council reached agreement on individual legislative texts
- The College of Commissioners in a historical perspective
- Negotiations on a withdrawal agreement
- Characteristics of the structures and institutions of science-advice systems
- Stage of the co-decision procedure at which the EP and Council reached agreement
- Priority 4: A Deeper and Fairer Internal Market with a Strengthened Industrial Base
- Priority 10: A Union of Democratic Change
- Total Commission staff
- Table 1 – Summary of benefits rights for EU citizens in a host Member State under the current EU rules
- Table 1 UK participation in certain instruments
- Women in EP and EU national parliaments
- Proportion of Members in each political group
- Article 50 TEU procedure
- Timeline towards the UK’s in-out referendum on EU membership
- Priority 1: A New Boost for Jobs, Growth and Investment
- Register of lobbyists
- The Scientific Advice Mechanism
- Priority 9: A Stronger Global Actor
- Overview of results from studies on TTIP’s economic impact on the EU and the USA
- Strengths of the political groups in each parliamentary term
- Lobbying regulation in the EU Member States
- Step by Step Article 50 of a Member State applicaiton to leave the EU
- Priority 2: A Connected Digital Single Market
- Impact assessment support to Parliament’s committees throughout the legislative cycle
- Size of political group
- Number of trilogues per year and per committee
- Code of conduct for lobbyists
- Petitions to the EP by field
- College of Commissioners
- Commissioners, portfolios and project teams
- TTIP negotiating documents and access
- Priority 5: A Deeper and Fairer Economic and Monetary Union
- College of Commissioners by age and gender (1999-2014)
- Parliamentary committees
- Activity in plenary
- Size of political groups in the EP by Member State (as of 1 March 2016)
- Legislative resolutions adopted in plenary since 2004
- Political make-up of the College of Commissioners
- Number of staff by Directorate-General
- Historical evolution of the number of Commission staff posts
- Proposals and legal acts adopted by the Commission
- Infringement procedures
Discussion
Trackbacks/Pingbacks
Pingback: Elezioni europee, 427 milioni di persone al voto – Sestopotere - May 24, 2019
Pingback: European Parliament: Facts and Figures | European Parliamentary Research Service - December 5, 2014